Subsea Acoustic Sensor Vibration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Subsea structures experience flow-induced vibration, leading to reduced equipment lifespan and potential catastrophic failure due to amplified disturbance forces at resonance frequencies, which existing monitoring techniques, such as accelerometers and acoustic sensors, either limit sensor lifetime or require costly and time-consuming maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus utilizing subsea acoustic sensors to detect acoustic energy characteristics and adjust operational parameters like flow rate or fluid composition in real-time through a closed-loop control system, using a Subsea Control Module to vary the choke valve and maintain vibration below a threshold, thereby reducing structural damage and resonance effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If accelerometers are mounted directly onto subsea structures to monitor vibration, then vibration monitoring capability is improved, but sensor lifetime is reduced due to exposure to vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration monitoring capabilityVSAvoidsensor lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses acoustic sensors as an intermediary to detect vibration indirectly through acoustic energy in seawater, rather than mounting sensors directly on the vibrating structure. This mediator approach allows vibration monitoring without exposing the sensor to the harsh vibrational environment, resolving the contradiction between monitoring capability and sensor lifetime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If acoustic sensors are used to monitor vibration remotely, then sensor reliability is improved, but response time for maintenance is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor lifetimeVSAvoidmaintenance response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback control system where acoustic sensors continuously monitor vibration, the controller processes the signals in real-time, and automatically adjusts flow parameters to reduce vibration. This continuous feedback mechanism enables immediate response to vibration events, eliminating the time delay associated with manual intervention while maintaining sensor reliability through remote operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting vibration through acoustic sensors and adjusting flow parameters without human intervention. The closed-loop control system self-regulates to reduce vibration, enabling immediate response time while maintaining sensor reliability through automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If flow rate is increased to maximize productivity, then fluid flow output is improved, but flow-induced vibration is amplified at resonance frequencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid flow outputVSAvoidflow-induced vibration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts flow parameters based on real-time vibration monitoring. The system continuously monitors acoustic energy and automatically modifies flow rate and other parameters to maintain productivity while avoiding resonance conditions. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize flow output while preventing harmful vibration amplification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (flow rate, fluid composition) in response to detected vibration levels. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system maintains high productivity when vibration is low and reduces flow parameters when approaching resonance frequencies, thereby maximizing output while minimizing harmful vibration effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If manual monitoring and maintenance procedures are used, then system complexity is reduced, but maintenance costs and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated feedback control where acoustic sensors continuously monitor vibration and the controller automatically adjusts flow parameters. This closed-loop system eliminates manual monitoring and intervention, significantly reducing maintenance time and costs despite the increased automation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-diagnosis and self-adjustment by automatically detecting vibration through acoustic sensors and modifying operational parameters without human intervention. This self-service capability reduces maintenance requirements and time consumption, offsetting the initial complexity of the automated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides continuous feedback for effective vibration control, maximizing fluid flow while keeping vibrational effects within safe limits, reducing maintenance costs and extending equipment life by automatically adjusting operational parameters based on detected acoustic energy characteristics.

Implementation Method 1

via at least one subsea acoustic sensor, detecting at least one characteristic associated with acoustic energy in sea water proximate to the sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic energy detection: Acoustics

Implementation Method 2

flow induced vibration can be experienced as fluid flows along a pipeline and this is proportional to a velocity of fluid flow along a fluid pathway

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow-induced vibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 3

particularly at resonance frequencies, be amplified by the structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentEP3669052B1Flow induced vibration reduction
Publication Date: 2023.04.19 BAKER HUGHES ENERGY TECH UK LTD
  • EP3669052B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3669052B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3669052B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method and apparatus are disclosed for reducing flow induced vibration in at least one subsea structure. The method comprises the steps of, via at least one subsea acoustic sensor (190), detecting at least one characteristic associated with acoustic energy in sea water proximate to the sensor (190), responsive to the detected characteristic, varying at least one operational parameter of a fluid flowing along a fluid flow pathway associated with a pipe member (160).