Dual-Action Check Valve for Subsea BOP ROV Port Backflow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Subsea blow-out preventers (BOPs) face issues with seawater contamination of hydraulic systems and hydraulic fluid leakage into the marine environment due to the lack of effective solutions for preventing backflow in ROV ports.

Innovation Solution

A dual-action check valve is introduced that provides backpressure to prevent flow in either direction, keeping hydraulic fluid within the system and seawater out, with the ability to allow return flow subject to hydrostatic pressure and spring rate of poppet springs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional single check valves are used in ROV ports, then hydraulic fluid can be kept in the system, but seawater can still enter the hydraulic system and contaminate it

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydraulic system integrityVSAvoidseawater contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The valve body is segmented into multiple chambers (first chamber and second chamber) with separate check valve mechanisms in each chamber. This segmentation allows independent control of fluid flow in opposite directions, enabling the first check valve to prevent seawater ingress while the second check valve manages hydraulic fluid egress, thus resolving the contradiction between maintaining system integrity and preventing contamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A communication passage acts as an intermediary between the first and second chambers, allowing controlled interaction between the two check valve systems. This intermediary mechanism enables coordinated operation of both check valves, ensuring that seawater cannot enter while allowing controlled hydraulic fluid return, thereby simultaneously achieving contamination prevention and system protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If ROV ports are plugged or manual valves are used, then seawater intrusion is prevented, but return flow out of the ROV port is not permitted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseawater intrusion preventionVSAvoidreturn flow capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The check valves are designed with dynamic spring-loaded poppet mechanisms that respond automatically to pressure differential. The poppets can open or close based on the direction and magnitude of fluid pressure, enabling automatic adaptation to different operational states (seawater intrusion prevention vs. hydraulic fluid return), thus resolving the contradiction between prevention and operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The dual-action check valve system is self-regulating and requires no external control or manual intervention. The spring-loaded poppets automatically respond to pressure conditions, opening to allow return flow when hydraulic pressure exceeds spring force and closing to prevent seawater intrusion when external pressure is applied, thereby achieving both protection and operational capability without external control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If backpressure is applied in both directions, then hydraulic fluid is retained in the system, but controlled backflow capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydraulic fluid retentionVSAvoidcontrolled backflow capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Each chamber has its own check valve with independently adjustable spring rates, allowing different backpressure characteristics in different directions. The first check valve can be tuned for high backpressure to prevent seawater ingress, while the second check valve can be tuned for lower backpressure to allow controlled hydraulic fluid return, thus resolving the contradiction between fluid retention and controlled backflow capability through localized differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dual-action check valve effectively prevents seawater intrusion and hydraulic fluid leakage, ensuring the integrity of the hydraulic system and minimizing environmental contamination by allowing controlled backflow.

Implementation Method 1

spring-loaded poppet valves within the apparatus

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 2

subject to a back pressure determined by a combination of the hydrostatic pressure and the spring rate of the poppet spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrostatic pressure: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11105435B2Subsea bop control system with dual-action check valve
Publication Date: 2021.08.31 NAT COUPLING
  • US11105435B2 patent drawing
  • US11105435B2 patent drawing
  • US11105435B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A subsea hydraulic system comprises a dual (or dual action) check valve on a port for connection to a remotely operated vehicle (ROV). The check valve provides backpressure to flow in either direction. This keeps hydraulic fluid in the hydraulic system, and seawater out. If flow needs to return to the ROV, it may flow out the port, subject to a selected back pressure.