Subsea Hydrate Inhibitor Injection Control Using Sensor Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydrate formation in hydrocarbon extraction operations is a widespread concern due to the excessive use of hydrate inhibitors, which increases costs and is not always effective in preventing hydrate formation.

Innovation Solution

An additive management system that monitors and controls hydrate formation conditions in hydrocarbon extraction systems by using sensors and chemical injection metering valves to adjust the flow rate and amount of hydrate inhibitors, providing targeted and precise control based on real-time data and environmental conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hydrate inhibitors are used excessively to prevent hydrate formation, then hydrate formation is blocked, but the cost of hydrocarbon extraction operations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrate formation preventionVSAvoidhydrate inhibitor usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors hydrate formation conditions (temperature, pressure, water content) and adjusts hydrate inhibitor injection rates based on real-time feedback. The controller compares actual conditions against hydrate formation thresholds and dynamically modifies injection rates to maintain prevention while minimizing chemical usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The hydrate inhibitor injection rate is made dynamic rather than static. The system adjusts injection rates in real-time based on changing operational conditions such as temperature fluctuations, pressure changes, and water content variations, allowing optimal prevention with minimal chemical consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If hydrate inhibitors are used excessively to prevent hydrate formation, then hydrate formation is blocked, but the cost of hydrocarbon extraction operations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrate formation preventionVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors hydrate formation conditions (temperature, pressure, water content) and adjusts hydrate inhibitor injection rates based on real-time feedback. The controller compares actual conditions against hydrate formation thresholds and dynamically modifies injection rates to maintain prevention while minimizing chemical usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the injection rate parameter of hydrate inhibitors based on varying operational conditions. By adjusting this parameter dynamically according to temperature, pressure, and water content measurements, the system achieves effective prevention at lower overall chemical consumption and reduced operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If traditional hydrate inhibition methods are used, then hydrate formation is blocked, but the control precision is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrate formation preventionVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors hydrate formation conditions (temperature, pressure, water content) and adjusts hydrate inhibitor injection rates based on real-time feedback. The controller compares actual conditions against hydrate formation thresholds and dynamically modifies injection rates to maintain prevention while minimizing chemical usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical control methods with automated electronic sensing and control. Sensors continuously measure temperature, pressure, and water content, and an electronic controller automatically adjusts injection rates, providing superior measurement and control precision compared to manual or mechanical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system reduces the unnecessary use of hydrate inhibitors, optimizing their application to prevent hydrate formation while minimizing costs and ensuring efficient hydrocarbon extraction operations.

Implementation Method 1

The controller receives feedback from one or more sensors and one or more flow meters of the hydrocarbon extraction system and determines, using the feedback, one or more parameters of a fluid flow in the hydrocarbon extraction system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature sensing:

Implementation Method 2

The controller receives feedback from one or more sensors and one or more flow meters of the hydrocarbon extraction system and determines, using the feedback, one or more parameters of a fluid flow in the hydrocarbon extraction system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing:

Implementation Method 3

Hydrate formation in hydrocarbon extraction operations is an industry wide concern. Hydrates are formations of ice and gas that may form due to high pressures and low temperatures in hydrocarbon extraction environments

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrate formation: Hydrates

Implementation Method 4

The additive management system may include one or more chemical injection metering valves configured to inject a chemical into the fluid flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical injection: Injector

Implementation Method 5

These hydrate inhibitors may block hydrate formation by lowering the freezing point of water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFreezing point depression:

Data Source

PatentEP4102027A1Additive management system
Publication Date: 2022.12.14 SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY BV
  • EP4102027A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4102027A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4102027A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A system comprises a chemical injection device (16) configured to inject a chemical into a fluid in a subsea hydrocarbon extraction system (10) at a rate of injection and a controller (24), communicatively coupled to the chemical injection device (16). The controller (24) is configured to receive feedback from at least one sensor (14, 20) configured to monitor the fluid flow in the subsea hydrocarbon extraction system, wherein the fluid flow comprises water and the injected chemical, determine a hydrate condition based at least in part on the feedback from the at least one sensor and determine a ratio of the injected chemical relative to water in the fluid flow based on feedback from the at least one sensor (16), The controller is also configured to control the chemical injection device (16) to adjust the rate of injection of the injected chemical into the fluid flow based at least in part on the hydrate condition and the ratio of the injected chemical relative to the water in the fluid flow.