Oil-Filled Electric Subsea Manipulator for Precise Force Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current subsea manipulation systems, particularly for remotely operated underwater vehicles (ROVs), lack sophisticated control mechanisms and are limited by the use of hydraulic manipulators that are weak and lack positional or force feedback, making them unsuitable for advanced manipulation tasks.

Innovation Solution

The development of a subsea manipulator using oil-filled electric actuators with coordinated joint control, including linear actuators and an end effector with a rotational joint and tool motor, enabling precise motion control and tool changes without human intervention, utilizing a split spring engagement ring clamp for tool attachment and detachment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If hydraulic manipulators are used for subsea applications, then high force and power are achieved, but positional precision and force feedback are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanipulator powerVSAvoidpositional feedback precision
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces hydraulic actuators with electric actuators that incorporate direct-drive motors and precision encoders. This substitution eliminates hydraulic fluid dynamics while providing both high torque output and precise positional feedback through electronic control systems and feedback sensors, resolving the contradiction between power delivery and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements comprehensive feedback systems including joint position encoders, force/torque sensors at the end effector, and pressure sensors for oil-filled actuators. These feedback mechanisms enable closed-loop control that maintains high force output while achieving precise positional and force control, directly addressing the lack of feedback in traditional hydraulic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If electric actuators are used for subsea manipulation, then positional precision and control sophistication are improved, but force capacity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositional control precisionVSAvoidmanipulator force capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs nested actuation systems where electric motors provide primary motion control, while oil-filled chambers within the same actuator housing provide force amplification and compliance control. This nested architecture allows the system to achieve both precise positional control from the electric motor and high force capacity from the hydraulic-like oil pressure, simultaneously satisfying both requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite actuation mechanisms combining electric motor components with oil-filled flexible chambers. The electric motor provides precision motion while the oil-filled elastomeric chambers provide force multiplication and compliance, creating a composite actuator that delivers both high precision and high force capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Force

If oil pressure is increased to maintain force capacity, then force output is maintained, but risk of leakage and failure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator force outputVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pressure parameter from high-pressure hydraulic operation to low-pressure oil-filled operation. The oil-filled actuators operate at pressures sufficient to provide compliance and force assistance but far below traditional hydraulic pressures, dramatically reducing leakage risks and component failure modes while maintaining force capacity through the compliance mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs sealed, maintenance-free electric actuators with integrated oil-filled chambers that eliminate the need for complex hydraulic sealing systems. The simplified architecture with fewer high-pressure interfaces reduces points of failure and improves reliability, even though individual components may be less robust than heavy-duty hydraulic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Adaptability or versatility

If tool changes are performed manually in subsea environment, then tool replacement is possible, but operation time and human intervention are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool interchangeabilityVSAvoidtool change time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated tool change system where the ROV manipulator autonomously performs tool attachment and detachment operations. The system uses sensor feedback to locate tools, align the end effector, execute the change sequence, and verify successful replacement without human intervention, eliminating manual tool change time while maintaining full tool interchangeability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs pre-positioned tools in standardized holders and pre-configured end effectors with automated grippers. The tool change system is pre-programmed with tool locations and change sequences, allowing rapid automated replacement without manual positioning or complex alignment procedures, significantly reducing tool change time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for precise and efficient control of the manipulator, enabling advanced manipulation tasks with force and impedance control, and facilitates autonomous tool changes, improving reliability and accuracy in subsea operations.

Implementation Method 1

The pressure of the oil in the manipulator is at least 1 psi higher than the hydrostatic pressure outside the actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrostatic pressure: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11559905B2Subsea manipulator
Publication Date: 2023.01.24 NAUTICUS ROBOTICS HOLDINGS INC
  • US11559905B2 patent drawing
  • US11559905B2 patent drawing
  • US11559905B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A subsea manipulator for a remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV) that includes at least one linear, oil-filled electric actuator to control a motion of the manipulator in a subsea environment is disclosed. The remotely operated underwater manipulator includes an electric actuator for each axis of motion of the manipulator, and an end effector that includes a rotational joint and a tool motor for controlling a tool affixed to the end effector. A method for changing the tool of the manipulator in a subsea environment is disclosed.