Subsea Safety Node With Hydraulic Isolation for Extreme Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Underwater hydrocarbon extraction facilities face challenges in protecting components from unforeseen conditions, such as extreme low temperatures, without the need for costly replacements or system alterations.

Innovation Solution

A safety node is retrofitted into the control system, comprising a marinised housing with a functional safety electronics module and a hydraulic manifold, allowing for protection by preventing operation outside design parameters through sensor feedback and hydraulic control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing facilities are protected by replacing entire facilities or components, then reliability is improved, but cost and practicality worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from unforeseen conditionsVSAvoidcost and practicality of replacement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the protection system into a separate, modular safety node that can be independently installed on existing facilities without replacing entire components. This segmentation allows the safety function to be added while preserving the original facility structure, thereby improving reliability without incurring the high costs and practical difficulties of full replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The safety node acts as an intermediary device between the existing facility components and the control system. It monitors operating conditions and intervenes only when necessary to prevent operation outside design parameters, thus providing protection without requiring replacement of the original facility components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If existing facilities are protected by retrofitting with a safety node, then cost and practicality are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost and practicality of retrofittingVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety monitoring and control functions are extracted from the main control system and placed into a dedicated safety node. This extraction simplifies the integration process during retrofitting, as the safety node operates semi-independently with its own sensor interfaces and hydraulic control, thereby reducing the complexity burden on the existing control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The safety node is designed to be self-contained with integrated sensor connections, power supply, logic processing, and hydraulic actuation capabilities. This self-service design minimizes the need for additional system modifications during retrofitting, reducing installation complexity while maintaining cost-effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If safety node commands DCV to switch paths, then protection from extreme conditions is achieved, but loss of hydraulic fluid occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from extreme conditionsVSAvoidhydraulic fluid venting
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The vent line, which initially appears to represent a loss of hydraulic fluid, is designed to safely discharge to the sea environment. The controlled venting of small amounts of fluid provides a reliable fail-safe mechanism that protects the facility from extreme conditions, converting the potential harm of fluid loss into a beneficial safety feature that prevents catastrophic failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentEP3334895B1Subsea safety node
Publication Date: 2023.08.30 BAKER HUGHES ENERGY TECH UK LTD
  • EP3334895B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3334895B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3334895B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A safety node 1 for a hydrocarbon extraction facility control system, the node comprising: a hydraulic input 11; a hydraulic output 12; a directional control valve 10 disposed between the hydraulic input and the hydraulic output; and a functional safety electronics module 4 containing a logic solver 6 in operable communication with the directional control valve; wherein the logic solver is configured to operate the directional control valve to permit hydraulic communication between the hydraulic input and the hydraulic output in response to the presence of a given condition and inhibit hydraulic communication between the hydraulic input and the hydraulic output in response to the absence of a given condition.