Subsea Safety Node for Hydraulic Shutdown Under Extreme Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Underwater hydrocarbon extraction facilities face challenges in protecting components from unforeseen conditions, such as extreme temperatures, without the practicality or cost-effectiveness of replacing entire systems or components.

Innovation Solution

A safety node is retrofitted into the control system, comprising a hydraulic input, directional control valve, and functional safety electronics module with a logic solver, which manages hydraulic communication based on predefined conditions like temperature or pressure ranges, allowing for safe operation within design parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If entire facilities or components are replaced to protect against unforeseen conditions, then reliability is improved, but cost and practicality worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against unforeseen conditionsVSAvoidcost and practicality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the control system into modular components, inserting a safety node as a separate functional unit between the existing control system and the subsea tree. This segmentation allows protection functionality to be added without replacing entire facilities, resolving the contradiction between improved reliability and reduced cost/practicality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The safety node acts as an intermediary device between the existing control system and the subsea tree. It monitors conditions and intermediates hydraulic signals to prevent operation outside design parameters, providing protection without requiring replacement of existing components, thus improving reliability while maintaining cost-effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the control system is altered to add protection functionality, then reliability is improved, but device complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from unforeseen conditionsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the safety functionality into a separate node rather than integrating it into the existing control system, the invention adds protection without increasing overall system complexity. The safety node operates as an independent module with clear input/output interfaces, maintaining simplicity while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The safety node contains self-contained monitoring and control logic that autonomously evaluates conditions and actuates the directional control valve without requiring complex external control system modifications. This self-service capability adds reliability while minimizing increases in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of manufacture

If existing facilities are protected without replacement, then cost is reduced, but the ability to operate outside design parameters worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost-effectivenessVSAvoidprotection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The safety node serves as an intermediary that monitors process conditions and intervenes when parameters exceed design limits. It receives hydraulic signals from the existing control system, evaluates conditions through sensors, and blocks or modifies signals to prevent unsafe operation, thereby providing robust protection capability while maintaining cost-effectiveness of the retrofitted system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces potential mechanical/physical modifications to existing facilities with a hydraulic control-based safety node that uses fluid pressure signals for monitoring and control. This substitution provides effective protection capability while avoiding the high costs associated with mechanical modifications or component replacements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11613954B2Subsea safety node
Publication Date: 2023.03.28 BAKER HUGHES ENERGY TECH UK LTD
  • US11613954B2 patent drawing
  • US11613954B2 patent drawing
  • US11613954B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A safety node for a hydrocarbon extraction facility control system, the node comprising: a hydraulic input; a hydraulic output; a directional control valve disposed between the hydraulic input and the hydraulic output; and a functional safety electronics module containing a logic solver in operable communication with the directional control valve; wherein the logic solver is configured to operate the directional control valve to permit hydraulic communication between the hydraulic input and the hydraulic output in response to the presence of a given condition and inhibit hydraulic communication between the hydraulic input and the hydraulic output in response to the absence of a given condition.