Autonomous Subsea Well Intervention Docking for Lower Vessel Standby

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high operational costs associated with maintaining a seaborne vessel near a subsea well for extended periods during slickline and electric line interventions are a significant challenge, as it increases the overall cost of subsea well operations.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous robotic system is deployed from a docking system, which is tethered to a seaborne vessel but operates independently within a subsea wellbore, allowing the vessel to travel to other locations while the robotic system performs interventions, reducing the need for continuous vessel presence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a seaborne vessel remains afloat above a subsea well for extended periods to perform slickline and electric line interventions, then the intervention operations can be performed, but the operational costs greatly increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintervention operation capabilityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the intervention operation into two independent components: a seaborne vessel that deploys the docking system and an autonomous robotic system that performs the actual well intervention. This segmentation allows the vessel to leave after deployment while the robot continues operations independently, eliminating the need for continuous vessel presence and reducing operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous robotic system performs well intervention operations independently without requiring continuous human oversight or vessel presence. The robot navigates the wellbore, performs interventions, and returns to the docking system autonomously, enabling self-service operations that reduce the need for expensive vessel standby time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If a seaborne vessel remains stationed above a subsea well for extended periods, then intervention operations can be performed, but the vessel occupancy time and overall cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintervention operation efficiencyVSAvoidvessel occupancy time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the deployment function (performed by the vessel) from the intervention execution function (performed by the autonomous robot). This allows the vessel to complete its mission quickly by deploying the docking system and robotic unit, then depart while the robot continues operations, significantly reducing vessel occupancy time while maintaining intervention productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational mode from manual vessel-based intervention to autonomous robot-based intervention. This parameter change enables continuous operations without vessel presence, transforming the time-cost relationship by allowing the vessel to be released immediately after deployment while interventions proceed autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If slickline and electric line methods are used for subsea well intervention, then the well can be serviced, but a seaborne vessel must remain afloat above the well location

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewell intervention capabilityVSAvoidsystem configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous robotic system acts as an intermediary between the seaborne vessel and the subsea well. The vessel deploys the robot, which then performs all intervention operations independently. This intermediary eliminates the direct requirement for the vessel to remain positioned above the well, simplifying the operational configuration while maintaining full intervention capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical well intervention methods (slickline and electric line operations requiring vessel presence) with an autonomous robotic system that uses integrated navigation, actuation, and control systems. This substitution eliminates the need for continuous vessel-m Well connection while preserving intervention capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12607080B2Systems and methods for autonomous well intervention
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US12607080B2 patent drawing
  • US12607080B2 patent drawing
  • US12607080B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes an autonomous robotic system and a docking system deployed by a seaborne vessel. The docking system houses the autonomous robotic system and couples to a subsea structure of a subsea system. The subsea structure is disposed on a sea floor. The autonomous robotic system deploys from the docking system into a wellbore of a subsea well of the subsea system. The autonomous robotic system also moves within the wellbore.