Subspace Nesting Evaluation for Laser Cutting Layout Optimization
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing methods for nesting workpieces on a raw material sheet for laser cutting processes are not able to achieve the best possible nesting results, leading to inefficiencies in material and time usage.
Innovation Solution
A method and system for nesting workpieces using a flatbed machine tool that incorporates evaluation criteria such as subspace overlap, beam break angles, and cutting time, with a data aggregation routine to optimize the nesting process, allowing for real-time adjustments and improvements based on a large database of user evaluations.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Manufacturing precision
If geometric nesting is performed first with specified quality parameters, then a movement sequence can be determined, but the nesting results can always be further improved and existing methods have not always been able to achieve the best nesting
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by performing geometric nesting first to establish an initial arrangement, then using this as a foundation for subsequent optimization. The system determines a movement sequence based on the preliminary nesting result, and then iteratively improves the nesting by evaluating multiple criteria including material efficiency, cutting time, and quality parameters. This stepwise approach allows the system to start with a feasible solution and progressively refine it to achieve optimal nesting.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements feedback by continuously evaluating nesting results against multiple criteria (material efficiency, cutting time, quality parameters) and using this evaluation information to generate improved nesting arrangements. The system aggregates evaluation data from multiple sources including user feedback and process data, then uses this aggregated information to adjust and improve subsequent nesting iterations. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to learn from past performance and continuously improve nesting quality.
2Loss of substance
If existing nesting methods are used, then the nesting process can be completed, but material efficiency and time efficiency are not optimized
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing multiple nesting parameters simultaneously including workpiece arrangement positions, cutting sequence order, and movement paths. The system evaluates different parameter combinations against criteria such as material utilization rate, total cutting time, and number of beam breaks. By systematically varying and optimizing these parameters, the system achieves improved material efficiency while reducing cutting time compared to conventional single-parameter optimization methods.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements dynamics by making the nesting solution adaptive and flexible rather than static. The system can dynamically adjust the nesting arrangement and cutting sequence based on real-time evaluation of multiple criteria. The movement sequence is dynamically optimized to minimize travel time and energy consumption, and the nesting arrangement can be dynamically refined through iterative evaluation. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt to different material types, workpiece configurations, and machine capabilities.
3Manufacturing precision
If more evaluation criteria are considered in the nesting process, then better nesting results can be achieved, but the complexity of the nesting process increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies segmentation by dividing the complex nesting optimization process into distinct modular evaluation stages. Each evaluation criterion (material efficiency, cutting time, quality parameters) is assessed separately through dedicated evaluation routines. The system segments the optimization process into: geometric nesting evaluation, movement sequence evaluation, quality parameter evaluation, and aggregated result evaluation. This modular segmentation makes the complex multi-criteria optimization process more manageable and computationally efficient.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements universality by creating a multi-functional evaluation system that can assess multiple different criteria using a unified framework. The evaluation system is designed to handle diverse evaluation criteria (geometric, temporal, quality-related) through a single versatile evaluation algorithm that can be configured to prioritize different criteria based on specific requirements. This universal evaluation framework reduces overall system complexity by providing a single integrated solution rather than requiring separate specialized systems for each criterion.
Data Source
Figure 1~2
Figure 3
AI summary
The invention relates to the nesting of sub-spaces (9A-9F), wherein an evaluation algorithm (44) for generating evaluation data, settlement data and/or sequence data (43") is used together with at least one data aggregation routine. The settlement data have effect on the generating of new sequence data (43") in order to improve an arrangement of nested sub-spaces (9A-9F) in respect of evaluation criteria.