Substitutable Item Cohorts for Cross-Platform Price Competitiveness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions fail to effectively measure price competitiveness at a group level for substitutable items across digital platforms, ignoring the importance of selection and pricing of similar or substitutable products, which is crucial in the hyper-competitive retail landscape.

Innovation Solution

A cohort-based approach is introduced to determine a competitiveness value for sets of substitutable items by defining cohorts based on category, item type, brand, attributes, and price buckets, using normalized demand values and demand-weighted average selling prices to identify the best value digital platforms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If individual product pricing is tracked and compared across digital platforms, then price tracking accuracy is improved, but the ability to measure competitiveness at a group level deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprice tracking accuracyVSAvoidgroup level competitiveness measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the analysis into two levels: individual product price tracking (maintaining precision) and cohort-based group analysis (enabling versatility). By dividing substitutable items into cohorts based on category, item type, brand, attributes, and price buckets, the system simultaneously achieves accurate individual tracking and meaningful group-level competitiveness measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of analysis by moving from single-product comparison to cohort-based group comparison. This dimensional shift allows the system to measure competitiveness at both individual and group levels, resolving the contradiction between tracking precision and group-level adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If prices of exactly similar products are compared across digital platforms, then price comparison accuracy is improved, but the relevance to substitutable products deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprice comparison accuracyVSAvoidsubstitutable product analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating specific cohorts for different types of substitutable items based on their characteristics (category, item type, brand, attributes). Each cohort is analyzed with appropriate metrics tailored to its specific nature, allowing accurate price comparison within cohorts while maintaining versatility across different product types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the comparison parameters from exact product matching to cohort-based grouping. By defining cohorts using multiple parameters (category, item type, brand, attributes, price buckets), the system maintains measurement precision for comparable items while expanding adaptability to analyze substitutable products that are not exactly identical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If best value is offered on every product individually, then customer satisfaction is improved, but sustainability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer satisfactionVSAvoidpricing sustainability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by focusing competitiveness efforts on cohorts where the digital platform has competitive advantage rather than attempting to offer best value on every single product. This selective approach maintains customer satisfaction in key areas while preserving pricing sustainability by avoiding unsustainable price wars on all products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the pricing strategy parameter from individual product-based to cohort-based. By evaluating competitiveness at the cohort level and making pricing decisions accordingly, the system achieves better customer satisfaction in competitive cohorts while maintaining overall pricing sustainability through strategic resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12462286B2System and method for determining a competitiveness value
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 FLIPKART INTERNET PTE LTD
  • US12462286B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for determining a competitiveness value for set(s) of substitutable items. The method comprises determining, a relative demand value of each set from the set(s) of substitutable items based on a normalized demand value of said each set of substitutable items determined for each of a plurality of digital platforms. The method thereafter comprises identifying, a first target digital platform for each set of substitutable items, based on a demand weighted average selling price of said each received set of substitutable items for one or more of the plurality of digital platforms. Further, to determine the competitiveness value, the method comprises identifying, a second target digital platform for the set(s) of substitutable items based on the first target digital platform identified for each set of substitutable items and a relative demand value of said each set of substitutable items.