Substrate Bonding Completion Detection for Higher Throughput

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing substrate bonding apparatuses face inefficiencies due to varying bonding times, leading to unnecessary waiting periods and waste, as they rely on fixed time intervals rather than detecting actual bonding completion.

Innovation Solution

A substrate bonding apparatus and method that includes a detecting unit to monitor contact regions between substrates and a determining unit to assess bonding completion based on detected information, allowing for precise timing of the bonding process and reducing waiting times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed time interval is used to determine bonding completion, then bonding reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to unnecessary waiting time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding completion determination accuracyVSAvoidprocessing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the detecting unit continuously monitors contact regions between substrates during bonding, and the determining unit adjusts the bonding process based on real-time detection information. This closed-loop feedback system replaces fixed time intervals with dynamic, condition-based determination of bonding completion, resolving the contradiction between reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The bonding process determines its own completion status through self-detection of contact region formation. The system uses the physical state of the substrates themselves (contact regions) as the criterion for completion, eliminating the need for external time-based control and enabling immediate termination when bonding is actually complete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If a longer fixed time is set to accommodate varying bonding times, then bonding reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to waiting after actual bonding completion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding completion assuranceVSAvoidwaiting time after bonding completion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Real-time detection feedback allows the system to identify the exact moment when contact regions form and bonding completes, eliminating the need to extend the bonding time beyond what is actually required. The determining unit receives continuous detection information and terminates the process immediately when completion criteria are met.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/time-based bonding completion determination system with an optical or sensing-based detection system. Instead of relying on predetermined time intervals, the system uses detection units to monitor and identify the actual formation of contact regions, substituting physical time measurement with direct observation of bonding state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If real-time detection of contact regions is implemented, then productivity is improved by eliminating waiting time, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing throughputVSAvoiddetection and determination system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a detection unit as an intermediary between the bonding process and the control system. This intermediary component captures real-time information about contact region formation and transmits it to the determining unit, enabling productivity improvement without requiring complex direct integration between all system components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The detection unit creates an informational copy or representation of the bonding state (contact region formation) without requiring physical intervention in the bonding process itself. This copying mechanism allows the system to monitor and determine completion based on detected information rather than complex physical measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20240014079A1Substrate bonding apparatus and substrate bonding method
Publication Date: 2024.01.11 SCREEN HOLDINGS CO LTD
  • US20240014079A1 patent drawing
  • US20240014079A1 patent drawing
  • US20240014079A1 patent drawing

AI summary

To improve the throughput of substrate bonding. A substrate bonding apparatus that bonds first and second substrates so that contact regions in which the first and second substrates contact are formed in parts of the first and second substrates and the contact regions enlarge from the parts, the apparatus including: a detecting unit detecting information about the contact regions; and a determining unit determining that the first and second substrates can be carried out based on the information detected at the detecting unit. In the substrate bonding apparatus, the information may be information, a value of which changes according to progress of enlargement of the contact regions, and the determining unit may determine that the first and second substrates can be carried out if the value becomes constant or if a rate of changes in the value becomes lower than a predetermined value.