Substrate Carrier Composite Design for Stress Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing substrate carriers, such as silicon wafer carriers, tend to break during processing, cleaning, or refurbishment due to stress, while silicon carbide carriers are heavier and can damage substrate supports or break under stress from pocket formation.

Innovation Solution

A substrate carrier with a substantially planar body and a plurality of holding elements arranged on its surface, which can be formed from materials like silicon, silicon carbide, or molybdenum, and may include a two-layer configuration with holes and protrusions to reduce stress and prevent substrate movement, and pockets with support surfaces or tabs to securely hold substrates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If silicon wafer carriers are used, then substrates can be carried, but the carriers tend to break during processing, cleaning, and refurbishment due to stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrier durabilityVSAvoidcarrier strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate carrier uses a composite structure combining silicon carbide layer and molybdenum layer. The silicon carbide provides high strength and stress resistance, while the molybdenum layer reduces overall weight. This composite material approach resolves the contradiction between durability and strength by leveraging the complementary properties of both materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The carrier is divided into functional layers: a silicon carbide layer for structural strength and stress resistance, and a molybdenum layer for weight reduction. The pockets are also segmented into rounded-bottom pockets for substrate support and flat-bottom pockets for specific substrate types, allowing each segment to optimize its function without compromising overall integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If silicon carbide wafer carriers are used, then carrier strength is improved, but the carriers are heavier and can damage substrate supports

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrier strengthVSAvoidcarrier weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The dual-layer composite structure combines heavy silicon carbide (for strength) with lighter molybdenum (for weight reduction). The molybdenum layer specifically addresses the weight issue while the silicon carbide layer maintains the necessary strength, resolving the contradiction between these two properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The silicon carbide material is applied locally where maximum strength is needed (in the structural framework and pocket regions), while the molybdenum material is used in areas where weight reduction is prioritized. This localized material distribution optimizes the strength-to-weight ratio throughout the carrier structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If pockets are formed in the carrier, then substrates can be held, but stresses in the carrier result from the pocket formation causing breakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate holding capabilityVSAvoidcarrier integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The pockets are designed with specific geometric characteristics: rounded bottoms for general substrates and flat bottoms for specific types. The pocket walls are optimized for thickness and curvature radius to distribute stresses evenly. This localized geometric optimization allows effective substrate holding while minimizing stress concentration that would cause breakage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The pocket geometry parameters (curvature radius, wall thickness, bottom shape) are specifically optimized to reduce stress during formation and use. The rounded-bottom design with controlled curvature radius distributes mechanical stresses more evenly compared to sharp-cornered pockets, preventing crack initiation and propagation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If holding elements are arranged on the surface with at least three elements around each substrate position, then substrate holding security is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate holding securityVSAvoidcarrier structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The holding function is segmented into multiple discrete holding elements distributed around each substrate position. Each holding element independently contributes to substrate retention, and the minimum of three elements per position provides redundant security. This segmentation approach achieves reliable substrate holding through simple, repeatable geometric patterns rather than complex mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11676849B2Substrate carrier
Publication Date: 2023.06.13 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US11676849B2 patent drawing
  • US11676849B2 patent drawing
  • US11676849B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of substrate carriers and method of making the same are provided herein. In some embodiments, a substrate carrier includes a substantially planar body formed of an upper layer stacked on a lower layer; and a plurality of pockets formed in the substantially planar body each of which includes a support surface surrounding the pocket for supporting a substrate.