Substrate Contact Elements Reducing Particle Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In semiconductor processing, contaminants adhere to the backside of substrates during handling, leading to particle generation and reduced device performance, despite conventional solutions that reduce contact area between substrates and handling devices.

Innovation Solution

The use of substrate contact elements formed from materials with a hardness less than or equal to silicon, low adhesion, high static friction to prevent sliding, and surface roughness less than 10 Ra, which are also electrically conductive, such as aluminum oxide, silicon nitride, or stainless steel, to minimize particle generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If contact area between substrate and handling devices is reduced, then particle generation is mitigated, but large numbers of particles are still generated even with smallest contact areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle generationVSAvoidsubstrate contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters of the contact elements, specifically using materials with hardness less than or equal to silicon (such as aluminum oxide, silicon nitride, or conductive plastics), low adhesion properties, and controlled surface roughness (less than or equal to 10 Ra). These parameter changes allow the contact elements to minimize particle generation while maintaining reliable substrate handling, resolving the contradiction between reducing particle generation and ensuring substrate contamination control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material properties in the contact elements, combining electrical conductivity with low hardness (less than or equal to silicon), low adhesion, and controlled surface roughness. This composite approach allows the contact elements to simultaneously prevent particle generation, maintain electrical connectivity for substrate positioning, and reduce contamination, thereby resolving the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If material hardness is increased to prevent scratching and abrasion, then resistance to scratching improves, but particle generation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to scratching and abrasionVSAvoidfriction or abrasion resulting particulates
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by using materials with hardness less than or equal to silicon rather than harder materials. This parameter change prevents particle generation through abrasion while the low adhesion and controlled surface roughness properties compensate by preventing substrate sliding and maintaining handling stability, thus resolving the contradiction between scratch resistance and particle generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If coefficient of friction is increased to prevent substrate sliding, then sliding prevention improves, but particle generation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatic friction to prevent slidingVSAvoidparticle generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses materials with optimized surface properties including controlled surface roughness (less than or equal to 10 Ra) and low adhesion, combined with appropriate hardness. This combination provides sufficient static friction to prevent substrate sliding during handling while minimizing particle generation through abrasion, as the surface properties are tuned to reduce friction-induced particulates while maintaining grip on the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces contamination and particle generation during substrate handling and processing, preventing contaminants from reaching the front-side of the substrate and minimizing yield loss and device performance issues.

Implementation Method 1

having a coefficient of static friction large enough to prevent sliding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3084818B1Substrate support apparatus having reduced substrate particle generation
Publication Date: 2020.11.25 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • EP3084818B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3084818B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3084818B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

Embodiments of apparatus for supporting a substrate are disclosed herein. In some embodiments, an apparatus for supporting a substrate includes: a support surface; and a plurality of substrate contact elements protruding from the support surface, wherein the plurality of substrate contact elements are formed of a material having a hardness less than or equal to a hardness of silicon, having a low adhesion, having a coefficient of static friction large enough to prevent sliding, having a surface roughness less than or equal to 10 Ra, and that is electrically conductive.