Substrate Deformation Computation in Thermo-Compression Bonding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for mechanical analysis of thermo-compression bonding are time-consuming due to complex finite element computations, limiting the number of temperature snapshots and hindering rapid redesign of substrate structural layouts.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of Global Reduced Order Modeling, Zonal Reduced Order Modeling, and Layer-by-Layer finite element modeling methodologies to efficiently compute substrate deformations by reducing computational effort and enabling parallelization, using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition to determine temperature and displacement factors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If full finite element computations are used for mechanical analysis of thermo-compression bonding, then prediction accuracy is improved, but computational time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate structure is segmented into multiple layers, and the modeling approach is divided into global reduced order modeling, zonal reduced order modeling, and layer-by-layer finite element modeling. This segmentation allows computational resources to be focused on critical regions while using simplified models for other areas, thereby reducing overall computational time while maintaining prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Reduced order models serve as intermediaries between full finite element computations and rapid predictions. These reduced order models are pre-computed from full FEM solutions and then used to rapidly predict substrate deformations for different temperature distributions, acting as a computational bridge that maintains accuracy while dramatically reducing computation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If full finite element computations are used for mechanical analysis, then model fidelity is improved, but memory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel fidelityVSAvoidmemory requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate is divided into multiple layers, allowing the modeling to be performed in a layer-by-layer manner. This segmentation reduces the memory footprint by processing smaller subsystems independently rather than loading the entire complex model into memory simultaneously, while still maintaining overall model fidelity through proper interface coupling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and pre-computes reduced order models from full finite element solutions. These extracted reduced order models contain the essential mechanical behavior information but in a compact form that requires significantly less memory, while still providing accurate predictions when applied to different temperature distributions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Loss of information

If complex finite element computations are performed for each temperature snapshot, then analysis completeness is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis completenessVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Reduced order models are pre-computed from full finite element solutions before the actual analysis of multiple temperature snapshots. This preliminary action captures the essential mechanical behavior in advance, allowing subsequent predictions for different temperature distributions to be made rapidly without repeating full FEM computations, thus maintaining analysis completeness while dramatically improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the computational parameters by transitioning from full-order models to reduced-order models. This parameter change involves reducing the number of degrees of freedom in the computational model while preserving the essential physics, enabling rapid computation across multiple temperature snapshots without sacrificing the completeness of the thermal-mechanical analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240177812A1Systems and methods for expedient computation of substrate deformations in thermo-compression bonding
Publication Date: 2024.05.30 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US20240177812A1 patent drawing
  • US20240177812A1 patent drawing
  • US20240177812A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system can apply a Global Reduced Order Modeling (ROM), a Zonal ROM, or a Layer-By-Layer analysis method to accelerate computations of a static displacement field of a substrate during modeling of thermo-compression bonding. The system fully takes into account a glass transition of dielectric substrates as well as nonhomogeneity of the various layers.