Substrate Loader with Rotating Gripper Arrays for Belt Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hybrid printers face inefficiencies in loading multiple substrates onto an endless transport belt, particularly in handling different substrate types with varying sizes and materials, which can lead to damage and require manual alignment.

Innovation Solution

A method using an array of rotatably mounted grippers that grip substrates at their leading portions, compensating for size and material differences, and utilize suction chambers to pull substrates onto the belt, allowing simultaneous loading and alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If substrates are loaded one by one manually or by conventional loaders, then alignment and damage prevention are manageable, but loading time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate loading speedVSAvoidtime for loading substrates
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple substrates are loaded simultaneously by combining multiple grippers into a single array that operates together. The support structure moves all grippers and their attached substrates as one unit, enabling parallel loading operations that dramatically increase productivity while maintaining proper alignment through the coordinated movement of the entire array.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The grippers engage and secure multiple substrates to the support structure before the actual loading motion begins. This preliminary gripping action ensures that substrates are firmly attached and positioned correctly on the support structure, preventing damage during transport and enabling synchronized movement during the loading process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Stability of the object's composition

If a rigid support structure is used to hold multiple substrates, then structural stability is improved, but damage to substrates occurs due to inability to compensate for size and material differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stability of support structureVSAvoidsubstrate damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure incorporates rotatably mounted grippers that can independently adjust their orientation and position. This dynamic capability allows each gripper to adapt to substrates of varying sizes and materials while maintaining firm grip, preventing damage through flexible accommodation rather than rigid constraint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure is divided into multiple independent gripper units, each capable of independent rotation and adjustment. This segmentation allows each gripper to handle substrates individually according to their specific characteristics, while the overall structure maintains stability through the coordinated arrangement of these modular units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If substrates are gripped at their trailing portions, then loading sequence is simplified, but substrate folds and wrinkles occur due to improper grip position

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading mechanism complexityVSAvoidsubstrate surface integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The grippers are positioned to engage substrates at their leading portions before the loading motion begins. This preliminary engagement at the correct position prevents folds and wrinkles by securing the substrate where it can be smoothly guided onto the conveyor belt, avoiding creases that would occur with trailing portion gripping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If a compact substrate loader is designed, then device complexity and cost are reduced, but capability to handle multiple substrate types simultaneously is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate loader constructionVSAvoidability to handle different substrate types
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure with rotatably mounted grippers serves multiple functions: it can accommodate substrates of different sizes, materials, and shapes while maintaining a relatively simple overall construction. The universal design allows the same basic structure to handle various substrate types by adjusting gripper orientation rather than requiring different specialized mechanisms for each substrate type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient, damage-free loading of multiple substrates with varying characteristics, reducing manual intervention and maintaining a compact, cost-effective substrate loader design.

Implementation Method 1

a negative pressure is applied to the substrates via the at least one suction chamber, so that trailing portions of each of the substrates are pulled onto the transport belt

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative pressure: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentUS20250256521A1Substrate loader for simultaneously loading multiple substrates on a transport belt
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 CANON KK
  • US20250256521A1 patent drawing
  • US20250256521A1 patent drawing
  • US20250256521A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for efficiently multiple loading substrates simultaneously onto an endless transport belt of a printer, including steps of engaging each substrate by an array of grippers, each gripper being rotatably mounted on a support beam; pivoting and/or rotating the support beam with the grippers gripping the substrates, so that the substrates are positioned on the transport belt over at least one suction chamber; driving the transport belt to move the substrates, while a negative pressure is applied to the substrates via the at least one suction chamber, so that trailing portions of each of the substrates are pulled onto the belt.