Iterative Substrate Model Selection for Lithography Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current lithographic technologies face challenges in accurately modeling and correcting non-linear distortions in substrate grids, which affects the precise placement and alignment of features in semiconductor devices, leading to inefficiencies in the manufacturing process.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced that iteratively selects and updates candidate basis functions and model parameters to improve the modeling of measurement datasets, using an Orthogonal Matching Pursuit algorithm and regularization techniques to optimize substrate models for better data representation and noise suppression.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If advanced alignment models are used to model and correct non-linear distortions, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the substrate area into multiple regions and applies different basis function models to each region. This allows complex non-linear distortions to be modeled using simpler local models rather than a single complex global model, thereby improving alignment accuracy while managing model complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic model selection where the complexity of the basis function model is adapted based on the local characteristics of each substrate region. Simpler models are used in regions with minimal distortion while more complex models are applied where needed, optimizing the balance between precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If more measurement data is collected to improve model accuracy, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the substrate into multiple regions and collects measurement data for each region separately. This segmentation allows the system to focus measurements on critical areas rather than uniformly sampling the entire substrate, reducing total measurement time while maintaining model accuracy in regions that matter most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial measurement strategies where not all substrate regions are measured with the same intensity. Critical regions receive more detailed measurement while less critical regions use coarser sampling, achieving acceptable model accuracy with reduced overall measurement time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240152059A1A method for modeling measurement data over a substrate area and associated apparatuses
Publication Date: 2024.05.09 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US20240152059A1 patent drawing
  • US20240152059A1 patent drawing
  • US20240152059A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a substrate model for describing a first measurement dataset and a second measurement dataset relating to a performance parameter. The method include obtaining candidate basis functions for a plurality of substrate models. Steps 1 to 4 are performed iteratively for the first measurement dataset and the second measurement dataset until at least one stopping criterion is met so as to determine the substrate model, the steps including: 1. selecting a candidate basis function from the candidate basis functions; 2. updating a substrate model by adding the candidate basis function into this substrate model to obtain an updated substrate model; 3. evaluating the updated substrate model based on the first measurement dataset and/or second measurement dataset; and 4. determining whether to include the basis function within the substrate model based on the evaluation.