Substrate Placement Using Profile Maps to Reduce Edge Tilt

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The placement of substrates in processing chambers is not optimized, leading to variations in product quality and increased scrapping due to factors like tilt near the edge of the substrate, which affects etch rates and chamber component conditions.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that uses substrate measurement data to generate profile maps, process them through a model, and determine recommended placements for substrates relative to chamber components, optimizing substrate placement to minimize tilt and improve processing outcomes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If substrates are placed in process chambers using conventional placement methods, then the processing can be performed, but variations in product quality occur due to unoptimized placement relative to chamber components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate quality consistencyVSAvoidplacement optimization system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurements of substrate surface profiles before processing and uses this data to determine optimal placement positions in advance. Profile maps are generated and analyzed to identify the best substrate placement location relative to chamber components before the actual processing occurs, preventing quality variations rather than correcting them afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where substrate surface profile measurements are continuously taken, processed through models to determine optimal placement, and then used to adjust subsequent substrate placements. The measured surface profiles provide feedback that refines the placement optimization for improving substrate quality consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If substrates are processed without optimized placement, then the processing flow remains simple, but scrap rates increase due to tilt and edge-related issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate yieldVSAvoidmeasurement and analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables substrates to essentially self-optimize their placement by measuring their own surface profiles and using this self-generated data to determine optimal placement positions. The substrate's own measurement data serves the function of guiding its placement optimization, reducing the need for external intervention while increasing yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the placement parameters (position and orientation) of substrates based on their measured surface profile characteristics. By adjusting placement parameters according to actual substrate measurements rather than using fixed placement rules, the system increases the proportion of substrates meeting quality specifications and reduces scrap rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conventional substrate placement is used, then the processing chamber operation is straightforward, but tilt near substrate edges affects etch rates and processing outcomes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing outcome consistencyVSAvoidprofile mapping and modeling system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary surface profile measurements and generates profile maps before processing to identify and correct placement issues in advance. By measuring and analyzing substrate surfaces beforehand, the system can determine optimal placement positions that prevent tilt-related processing problems rather than allowing them to occur during standard processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces mechanical trial-and-error placement adjustment with computational analysis. Instead of relying on mechanical positioning systems alone, the patent uses computer-based profile mapping, modeling, and calculation to determine optimal placement positions, substituting computational intelligence for purely mechanical placement control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240069537A1Substrate placement optimization using substrate measurements
Publication Date: 2024.02.29 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US20240069537A1 patent drawing
  • US20240069537A1 patent drawing
  • US20240069537A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes processing a first substrate in a process chamber of a substrate processing system according to a recipe while the first substrate is supported by a substrate support of the process chamber. The first substrate includes a first surface profile after the processing. The method further includes generating a first profile map of the first surface profile of the first substrate using a substrate measurement system of the substrate processing system. The method further includes processing data from the first profile map using a model. The model outputs a first estimated substrate placement value for a placement of the first substrate relative to one or more components of the substrate support. The method further includes determining a recommended placement for substrates on the substrate support based on the first estimated substrate placement value.