Substrate Plug Press Sections for Automated Planting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing planting methods using pre-shaped substrate plugs are time-consuming, user-unfriendly, and prone to damaging plants due to the need for manual handling and alignment of segments, which can be difficult for one person to perform efficiently, especially when trying to place roots between semi-frustoconical or groove-shaped segments.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a pre-shaped substrate plug with overdesigned press sections that automatically compress inwardly when pressed into a container, creating a snug fit around the plant material, allowing for easy and gentle placement without additional manual handling, and enabling automation, such as by a robot, to reduce damage and increase efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual handling and alignment of segments is used, then plant material can be placed in the substrate plug, but the process is time-consuming and user-unfriendly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of planting operationVSAvoidplanting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate plug is divided into multiple segments that can be easily separated and reassembled. The separation lines allow the segments to be pried apart with minimal force, enabling simple manual handling without complex tools or procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate plug design allows the plant material to be placed in the recess and the segments to automatically align and secure the plant when reassembled, reducing the need for precise manual alignment and complex handling procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Strength

If segments are clamped together with flat vertical walls, then the substrate plug maintains structural integrity, but roots and leaves of plants may get damaged or broken off

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrity of substrate plugVSAvoidplant damage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The segments are designed with curved surfaces instead of flat vertical walls. The curved outer surfaces and rounded separation lines allow segments to be clamped together while distributing pressure evenly, preventing damage to delicate plant roots and leaves

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate material is designed with flexible, compressible properties that allow segments to be gently pressed together to secure plant material without applying excessive clamping force that would damage roots or leaves

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple manual steps are performed to place plant material between segments, then precise positioning can be achieved, but the operation becomes difficult to perform by one person

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of plant placementVSAvoidease of single-person operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The plant material is placed in the recess before the segments are assembled. The recess is designed to hold the plant material in the correct position, and the segments are then simply clamped around it, eliminating the need for complex alignment procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The segmented design allows the plug to be opened wide to easily receive plant material, then closed to secure it. This simplifies the operation to basic opening, placing, and closing actions that can be easily performed by one person

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Device complexity

If the substrate plug is made as fixed units, then assembly is simplified, but the plant insertion recess cannot be automatically adjusted to fit the plant material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of substrate plug structureVSAvoidadaptability of plant insertion recess
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate plug segments are designed to be movable relative to each other, allowing the plant insertion recess to dynamically adjust its shape and size. The segments can be separated to enlarge the recess for easy plant placement, then closed to snugly fit around the plant material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method allows for quick and easy planting with reduced risk of plant damage, enabling cost-effective and automated planting processes that promote healthy growth by ensuring the plant material is gently contacted by substrate material, facilitating water and nutrient uptake.

Implementation Method 1

During the step of placing the plug in the aimed insertion position into the container, a pressing of the plug into the container needs to be performed, since otherwise the overdesigned press sections would not fit into the corresponding container parts. Because of this pressing, the overdesigned press sections automatically get (com)pressed inwardly in a sideways direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP3148317B1Planting method making use of a substrate plug with a press section
Publication Date: 2018.08.22 ANTHURA
  • EP3148317B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3148317B1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP3148317B1 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

A method and an assembly of a pre-shaped substrate plug 1 and a container 9 for planting out plant material, of which the plug comprises one or more press sections 5 sideways of an upwardly opening plant insertion recess 3, wherein outer wall dimensions of the press sections 5 are larger than inner wall dimensions of corresponding parts of the container9, such that during a step of placing the plug 1 in an insertion position into the container9, a pressing of the plug 1 into the container 9 needs to be performed for the press sections 5 to be able to fit into the corresponding parts of the container 9 while said press sections compress inwardly in a sideways direction and at least partly decrease the plant insertion recess 3 around a seed or lower plant part which had been placed therein preceding the pressing.