Substrate Process Modeling for Fast Condition Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies for optimizing substrate processing conditions rely heavily on expert knowledge or machine learning, which can be time-consuming, require a large number of experiments, and lack robustness, making it difficult to optimize process conditions efficiently and accurately across different environments and devices.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that acquires a mathematical model corresponding to a process result from a substrate processing apparatus, fits parameters of the model based on measurement data, and predicts process results, allowing for efficient optimization of process conditions with high accuracy, even without expert intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If expert knowledge or machine learning is used to optimize substrate processing conditions, then optimization accuracy can be improved, but the time required and number of experiments increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization accuracyVSAvoidtime required for optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of the optimization approach by using a physics-based mathematical model instead of data-driven machine learning. The model uses physical equations to directly calculate process conditions, eliminating the need for extensive experimental data collection and training, thus achieving fast and accurate optimization simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical trial-and-error experimentation process with a computational mathematical model. Instead of physically conducting numerous experiments to optimize conditions, the system uses mathematical calculations based on physical principles to determine optimal parameters directly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If machine learning models are trained to predict process results, then prediction capability is enhanced, but the number of experiments required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction capabilityVSAvoidnumber of experiments
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the approach from statistical learning to physics-based calculation. The mathematical model uses fundamental physical equations to predict process results directly, requiring minimal experimental data for calibration while maintaining high prediction reliability across different operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The mathematical model is designed to be universal and applicable across different substrate processing conditions and equipment configurations. Once calibrated with minimal data, the same model can predict results for various process parameters without requiring separate training datasets for each condition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If conventional optimization methods are used, then process conditions can be optimized, but adaptability to different environments and devices is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization efficiencyVSAvoidadaptability to different environments
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a mathematical model with adjustable parameters that can be calibrated for different environments and devices. The model structure remains the same, but parameters can be fitted to match specific equipment characteristics, providing both ease of operation and adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary calibration of the mathematical model using a small set of measurement data from the specific equipment. This preliminary action of fitting model parameters to actual device characteristics enables the system to adapt to different environments while maintaining efficient operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250200247A1Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 TOKYO ELECTRON LTD
  • US20250200247A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200247A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200247A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes a model acquisition unit configured to acquire a mathematical model corresponding to a process result obtained by a substrate processing apparatus; a data acquisition unit configured to acquire measurement data indicating the process result measured using the substrate processing apparatus; a fitting unit configured to fit a parameter of the mathematical model based on the measurement data; and a prediction unit configured to predict the process result based on the mathematical model with the parameter fitted by the fitting unit.