Engineered Substrates with Shear Strength Enhancement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional engineered substrates for solid-state transducer (SST) devices face issues with shear strength, leading to defects and shear tear-out during epitaxial growth, which affects the quality and reliability of SST structures.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a shear strength enhancement material with high shear modulus, such as titanium nitride or tungsten, and a bonding material with oxide-oxide bonding techniques to enhance the shear strength of the substrate, allowing for a robust epitaxial formation structure that bridges defects and resists shear tear-out.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a conventional engineered substrate with low shear strength material (e.g., silicon with Si(1,1,1) crystal orientation) is used, then the substrate is easy to manufacture, but shear tear-out occurs across defects during epitaxial growth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate manufacturingVSAvoidbond strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from low shear strength silicon (Si(1,1,1)) to high shear strength materials such as silicon carbide (SiC), sapphire (Al2O3), or diamond. This parameter change eliminates shear tear-out during epitaxial growth while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through established semiconductor fabrication processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite substrate structures combining multiple materials with complementary properties. For example, a silicon carbide layer is deposited on a silicon handle wafer, creating a composite structure that leverages the high shear strength of SiC while utilizing the ease of silicon processing for initial fabrication steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If defect mitigation material is applied to cure surface defects, then the surface smoothness is improved, but additional manufacturing steps and complexity are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface smoothnessVSAvoidsubstrate structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies defect mitigation material (such as spin-on-glass or CMP polishing) to the handle wafer surface before bonding the epitaxial layer. This preliminary action prevents defect propagation during subsequent epitaxial growth, eliminating the need for complex post-processing defect correction steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes the handle wafer after the epitaxial growth is complete, leaving only the high-quality epitaxial layer on the final substrate. This extraction eliminates the need to maintain complex multi-layer defect mitigation structures in the final product.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If extensive defect mitigation processes are used, then defect reduction is achieved, but manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect reductionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental material parameter to high shear strength substrates that inherently resist shear tear-out. This parameter change reduces defect formation at the source, eliminating the need for expensive multi-step defect mitigation processes and reducing overall manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in an engineered substrate assembly with enhanced shear strength, reducing defects and manufacturing costs by minimizing the need for extensive defect mitigation, and enabling the formation of high-quality SST structures with improved reliability.

Implementation Method 1

a bonding material with oxide-oxide bonding techniques to enhance the shear strength of the substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxide-oxide bonding: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

a shear strength enhancement material with high shear modulus, such as titanium nitride or tungsten

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress resistance: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentUS9331236B2Engineered substrates having epitaxial formation structures with enhanced shear strength and associated systems and methods
Publication Date: 2016.05.03 QROMIS INC
  • US9331236B2 patent drawing
  • US9331236B2 patent drawing
  • US9331236B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Engineered substrates having epitaxial formation structures with enhanced shear strength and associated systems and methods are disclosed herein. In several embodiments, for example, an engineered substrate can be manufactured by forming a shear strength enhancement material at a front surface of a donor substrate and implanting ions a depth into the donor substrate through the shear strength enhancement material. The ion implantation can form a doped portion in the donor substrate that defines an epitaxial formation structure. The method can further include transferring the epitaxial formation structure from the donor substrate to a front surface of a handle substrate. The shear strength enhancement material can be positioned between the epitaxial formation structure and the front surface of the handle substrate and bridge defects in the front surface of the handle substrate.