Parallel Elimination of Subsumed Blocks in Data Lakes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data lakes face inefficiencies in managing highly overlapping records, leading to system failures due to the creation of too many blocks during dynamic blocking, which overwhelms processing capabilities.

Innovation Solution

Implementing techniques such as intersection dynamic blocking, block elimination, and demotion to identify and eliminate highly overlapping blocks, using methods like Jaccard similarity and subsumption analysis to reduce block sizes and prevent system overload.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dynamic blocking is used to identify duplicate records in large databases, then record linkage capability is improved, but the number of blocks created becomes excessively large leading to system failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecord linkage capabilityVSAvoidnumber of blocks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the blocking process into multiple hierarchical levels (first-level blocking, second-level blocking, third-level blocking). Each level processes blocks of decreasing size, with the system dividing the original large dataset into manageable segments that are processed sequentially. This multi-level segmentation prevents the creation of excessively large block sets while maintaining comprehensive duplicate record identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates subsumed blocks from the processing pipeline. By identifying blocks that are subsets of other blocks (using subsumption analysis) and removing them from further processing, the system reduces the total number of blocks that need to be handled while preserving all necessary duplicate record relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If intersection dynamic blocking is applied to find duplicate records, then matching accuracy is improved, but processing time increases due to excessive block creation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary blocking operations at multiple levels before final duplicate record identification. By pre-processing the data through first-level, second-level, and third-level blocking, the system prepares the data in an optimized structure that enables accurate matching while reducing the computational burden during the actual duplicate identification phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes subsumed blocks that would otherwise be processed unnecessarily. By identifying and eliminating blocks that are subsets of other blocks using subsumption analysis, the system removes redundant processing steps while preserving all necessary matching relationships, thereby reducing total processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If multiple blocking levels are implemented to reduce block size, then system stability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidblocking process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the blocking process into three distinct hierarchical levels, each with specific block size thresholds and processing rules. This segmentation provides system stability by ensuring that no single blocking operation handles excessively large datasets, while the modular structure of multiple independent levels actually simplifies the overall system design compared to attempting to handle all data in a single blocking operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11086940B1Scalable parallel elimination of approximately subsumed sets
Publication Date: 2021.08.10 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US11086940B1 patent drawing
  • US11086940B1 patent drawing
  • US11086940B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for Scalable parallel elimination of approximately subsumed sets are described. A method for Scalable parallel elimination of approximately subsumed sets includes identifying a first plurality of blocks based at least on a plurality of records stored in a storage service of a provider network, determining a plurality of subsumption relationships between blocks from the first plurality of blocks, retaining a first subset of the first plurality of blocks and demoting a second subset of the first plurality of blocks based at least on the plurality of subsumption relationships, and iteratively performing dynamic blocking based at least on the first subset of the plurality of matching blocks and the second subset of the plurality of matching blocks to generate a subsequent pluralities of blocks.