Sucrose-6-Ester Synthesis via Continuous Counter-Current Dehydration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for synthesizing sucrose-6-esters are hindered by slow dehydration reactions, leading to the production of decomposed carbohydrates and significant amounts of unreacted sucrose, which reduces yield and results in undesirable chlorinated compounds during the synthesis of sucralose.

Innovation Solution

A continuous counter-current process involving a reaction mixture of sucrose, a polar aprotic solvent, and an organotin-based acylation promoter, where water is removed using gas or solvent vapors, allowing for faster reaction times and higher selectivity of sucrose-6-ester production through reactive distillation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If conventional batch dehydration methods are used, then water removal is achieved, but reaction time is excessively long (60 minutes or more)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction timeVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous counter-current contact between the reaction mixture and gas/solvent vapour phases, replacing conventional batch dehydration. This continuous operation maintains constant driving force for water removal throughout the process, achieving complete dehydration in 3-8 minutes versus 60+ minutes in batch methods, thereby dramatically improving productivity while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs gas or solvent vapour phases to remove water from the reaction mixture through counter-current contact. This pneumatic approach uses vapor-phase mass transfer to achieve rapid dehydration, replacing liquid-based batch methods and enabling the reaction to reach completion in minutes rather than hours, thus resolving the time-productivity contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Quantity of substance

If prolonged dehydration reaction is performed, then water is removed, but decomposed carbohydrates are produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater removal completenessVSAvoiddecomposed carbohydrates
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous counter-current dehydration process maintains optimal water removal rate throughout the reaction, preventing water accumulation that would otherwise require prolonged reaction times. This ensures complete water removal (achieving 26-60% water removal in 3-8 minutes) while minimizing residence time, thereby eliminating the condition for carbohydrate decomposition and reducing harmful by-products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent rapidly accelerates the dehydration step through counter-current vapor contact, completing water removal in 3-8 minutes versus 60+ minutes conventionally. This 'rushing through' the dehydration phase prevents the extended reaction time that causes carbohydrate decomposition, thus achieving complete water removal without generating harmful decomposed carbohydrates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Quantity of substance

If extended reaction time is used, then dehydration is complete, but unreacted sucrose remains in the product

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedehydration completenessVSAvoidproduct purity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous counter-current dehydration maintains constant water removal efficiency throughout the process, achieving complete dehydration (26-60% water removal) in just 3-8 minutes. This prevents the extended reaction time that leads to sucrose degradation and residual unreacted sucrose, thereby achieving both dehydration completeness and high product purity (95-98%) simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent rapidly completes the dehydration step through vapor-phase counter-current contact, achieving full water removal in 3-8 minutes versus 60+ minutes conventionally. This rapid completion prevents sucrose degradation and minimizes unreacted sucrose in the final product, resolving the contradiction between dehydration completeness and product purity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

4Temperature

If slow dehydration reaction occurs, then reaction conditions are mild, but yield of sucrose-6-ester is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction condition mildnessVSAvoidsucrose-6-ester yield
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses gas or solvent vapour phases to remove water from the reaction mixture through counter-current contact. This pneumatic dehydration method achieves rapid water removal at mild temperatures (30-100°C) in just 3-8 minutes, compared to prolonged heating required in batch methods. The vapor-phase mass transfer enables complete dehydration under mild conditions, achieving 95-98% yield without thermal degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process significantly reduces reaction time, minimizes the production of decomposed carbohydrates, and achieves high selectivity of sucrose-6-ester, thereby improving the yield and reducing the formation of undesirable by-products.

Implementation Method 1

removal of water from said first reaction mixture by contacting, in a continuous counter-current manner, with gas or solvent vapour capable of removing water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCo-distillation: Distillation

Implementation Method 2

forming a first reaction mixture comprising sucrose, a polar aprotic solvent, and an organotin-based acylation promoter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolvation: Solvation

Data Source

PatentEP2102220B1Method for the synthesis of sucrose-6-esters
Publication Date: 2010.07.21 TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LTD
  • EP2102220B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2102220B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The present application discloses a process for the synthesis of a sucrose-6-ester comprising: (a) forming a first reaction mixture comprising sucrose, a polar aprotic solvent, and an organotin-based acylation promoter; (b) removal of water from said first reaction mixture by contacting, in a continuous counter-current manner, with gas or solvent vapour capable of removing water at a temperature, pressure and residence time sufficient to afford a second reaction mixture which is substantially free from water; followed by (c) adding a carboxylic anhydride to said second reaction mixture to afford a third reaction mixture, and maintaining said third reaction mixture at a temperature and for a period of time sufficient to produce a sucrose-6-ester. The sucrose-6-ester can be used to make sucralose.