Suction Brake Obturator Dynamics for Sheet Conveyors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing suction brakes for sheet conveyors face challenges in reconciling the conflicting demands of the initial and second stages of the braking operation, leading to reduced throughput and potential sheet damage, as they require different gas pressure and volume settings based on the type and configuration of sheets being processed.

Innovation Solution

A suction brake system with a Bernoulli device and an obturator arrangement that allows independent regulation of suction during the second stage, enabling maximum gas flow during the initial phase while adjusting suction force based on sheet characteristics, using a throttling mechanism to optimize braking force during the second phase.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If high gas pressure and volume are used in the Bernoulli device during the initial stage to maximize suction, then the air evacuation speed is improved, but the braking force becomes too high during the second stage causing sheet damage and machine interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair evacuation speedVSAvoidsheet damage
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The suction brake system dynamically adjusts the gas pressure and volume supplied to the Bernoulli device between two operational stages. During the initial stage, high gas pressure and volume are provided to maximize suction and quickly evacuate air. During the second stage, the gas pressure and volume are reduced to provide optimal braking force. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by allowing maximum suction initially without causing sheet damage during the braking phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The suction brake operates in two distinct periodic stages: an initial stage with high gas pressure and volume for maximum suction, and a second stage with reduced gas pressure and volume for optimal braking. This periodic action allows the system to achieve quick air evacuation followed by controlled deceleration, preventing both slow processing and sheet damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Stability of the object's composition

If gas pressure and volume are adjusted for optimal braking force in the second stage, then sheet flatness is improved, but the air evacuation speed during the initial stage is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesheet flatnessVSAvoidair evacuation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes gas pressure and volume settings between stages. In the initial stage, high gas pressure and volume enable rapid air evacuation. In the second stage, reduced gas pressure and volume provide the precise braking force needed to maintain sheet flatness during deceleration. This dynamic parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction between speed and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary air evacuation at high speed during the initial stage before transitioning to the braking stage. By completing the air evacuation function first with high gas flow, the system then switches to lower gas pressure for braking, ensuring both quick preparation and stable operation without compromising either function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If high braking force is applied during the second stage to prevent ripples, then sheet flatness is improved, but throughput is reduced due to machine interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesheet flatnessVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the gas pressure and volume parameters from high values during the initial stage to optimized lower values during the second stage. This parameter change allows the braking force to be sufficient to prevent ripples and maintain flatness without being so high as to cause sheet damage or machine interruptions, thereby maintaining high throughput while ensuring sheet quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for optimal braking force adjustment based on sheet type and configuration, maintaining high throughput and preventing sheet damage by decoupling the constraints of the first and second stages of the braking operation, ensuring efficient sheet deceleration and flatness without reducing processing speed.

Implementation Method 1

suction is provided using the Venturi effect by forcing gas under pressure within the braking device to accelerate through a restriction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVenturi effect: Venturi Effect

Implementation Method 2

a suction brake first sucks out the air between the sheet and an operating surface of the braking device, and then, by pulling the sheet against the operating surface of the braking device, applies a restraining force to the sheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentUS11827478B2Suction brake, sheet conveyor with such suction brake and method of applying a retardation force to a moving sheet of material
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 BOBST MEX SA
  • US11827478B2 patent drawing
  • US11827478B2 patent drawing
  • US11827478B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a suction brake for use with a sheet conveyor configured to convey a succession of flat elements in sheet form along a conveying path between a first location and a second location, the suction brake comprising:a hollow body having an interior cavity and a face that defines a plurality of suction apertures that communicate with the interior cavity;an obturator arrangement coupled to the hollow body and moveable with respect to the suction apertures;the obturator arrangement being moveable between an open position, in which the obturator arrangement exposes the suction apertures to a maximum extent, and a restricted position, in which the obturator arrangement occludes the suction apertures to a maximum extent. The obturator may rotate or be linearly translated in moving between the open and restricted positions.