Sugar Beet Puller Wheel Gap Adjustment Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sugar beet harvesters face challenges in adjusting the gap between puller wheels to accommodate varying beet sizes, as current methods are time-consuming and complicated, leading to potential crop damage or ineffective harvesting.

Innovation Solution

A sugar beet harvester with puller wheels featuring a gap adjuster mechanism, utilizing a rotatable collar with helical bearings that allows axial movement of the wheels along their axles, enabling quick and selective adjustment of the gap between the wheels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the puller wheels are fixed in position, then the structure is simple and stable, but the gap cannot be adjusted for different beet sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegap adjustment capabilityVSAvoidwheel positioning mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by making the previously fixed wheel positioning adjustable. The wheel gap can now be dynamically changed to adapt to different beet sizes, transforming a static structure into a dynamic one that responds to varying operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying the gap distance between puller wheels from a fixed parameter to an adjustable one. This allows the operational parameter (gap size) to be changed based on the specific requirements of different crop sizes, improving adaptability without fundamentally redesigning the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the gap adjustment method involves unbolting wheels and inserting spacers, then the structure remains simple, but the adjustment process becomes time-consuming and complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegap adjustment processVSAvoidadjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The adjustment mechanism is made dynamic and movable, allowing the wheels to be repositioned along the axle without complete disassembly. This transforms a static, time-consuming manual adjustment process into a more flexible and quicker operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The adjustment system is segmented into movable components that can be independently repositioned. By dividing the wheel-axle connection into separable yet quickly reconnectable segments, the system enables rapid adjustment without requiring complete unbolting and reassembly of the entire wheel assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the puller wheels are too far apart, then larger beets can be harvested, but smaller beets may not be effectively pulled from the ground

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of varying beet sizesVSAvoidharvesting effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The gap parameter between puller wheels is made variable to match the size parameter of different beets. This allows the system to optimize the gap distance according to the specific crop size, ensuring effective harvesting across varying beet dimensions without sacrificing productivity for any size category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The wheel positioning system becomes dynamic, allowing operators to adjust the gap in real-time based on the beet size being harvested. This dynamic adaptation ensures that the harvesting mechanism remains effective regardless of variations in crop size, maintaining high productivity across different harvesting conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If the puller wheels are too close together, then smaller beets can be effectively harvested, but the wheels will damage the crop and reduce yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting effectiveness for small beetsVSAvoidcrop damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The gap parameter is made adjustable to prevent harmful effects. By increasing the gap distance when harvesting smaller beets, the system avoids the damaging effect of wheels being too close together, thus eliminating crop damage while maintaining harvesting effectiveness for small beets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for efficient and rapid adjustment of the gap between puller wheels, improving the harvesting process by preventing crop damage and ensuring effective beet extraction, regardless of varying beet sizes.

Implementation Method 1

A gap adjuster is associated with at least one of the puller wheels, and is configured to move the at least one puller wheel axially along the respective axle with axial rotation of the gap adjuster

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHelical bearing mechanism: Screw

Data Source

PatentUS10327380B2Root crop harvester
Publication Date: 2019.06.25 SPUDNIK EQUIP
  • US10327380B2 patent drawing
  • US10327380B2 patent drawing
  • US10327380B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sugar beet puller wheel set includes a pair of generally upright, spaced apart, symmetrically non-parallel puller wheels, rotatably disposed on axles attached to a frame and having a gap therebetween. A gap adjuster is associated with at least one of the puller wheels, and is configured to move the at least one puller wheel axially along the respective axle with axial rotation of the gap adjuster, allowing selective adjustment of the gap.