Sugar Thermolysis Cooling Layout for Compact Oxygenate Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for improved methods and systems for thermolytic fragmentation of sugars into C1-C3 oxygenates suitable for industrial-scale production, particularly focusing on reducing design complexity and improving efficiency and product yield.

Innovation Solution

A process involving an aqueous feedstock solution of sugar introduced into a fluidised bed reactor with heat-carrying particles, where the fragmentation product is cooled downstream of the reactor to a temperature of 230°C to 390°C before separating solids, allowing for a more compact and efficient reactor design without the need for integrated cooling units.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If cooling is integrated within the reactor, then cooling efficiency is improved, but device complexity and installation complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into separate functional units: the reactor for thermolytic fragmentation and a separate downstream cooling section. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining effective temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling function is extracted from the reactor and placed in a separate downstream section. This extraction simplifies the reactor design by removing the need for integrated cooling mechanisms, while the cooling function is still performed effectively in the dedicated cooling section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Temperature

If cooling is integrated within the reactor, then temperature control is improved, but installation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature controlVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the system into a reactor unit and a separate cooling section, each unit can be manufactured and tested independently, simplifying the installation process. The cooling section is then connected to the reactor outlet, maintaining effective temperature control without integrated complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling mechanism is taken out from the reactor structure and implemented as a separate downstream component. This extraction reduces installation complexity as the reactor can be installed and commissioned independently, with the cooling section added separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Volume of moving object

If reactor accommodates cooling unit, then space utilization is improved, but reactor mass and design complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidreactor design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor and cooling section are segmented as separate physical units, each with optimized dimensions for its specific function. The reactor is compact for high-temperature fragmentation, while the cooling section is designed separately for efficient heat removal, avoiding the need for a complex integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling section is positioned downstream in a separate spatial location rather than being integrated within the reactor volume. This dimensional separation allows both components to be optimized for their respective functions without compromising each other, while the overall system remains space-efficient through proper layout arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances reactor design simplicity, reduces installation complexity, improves space-efficiency, and achieves a good yield of C1-C3 oxygenates, benefiting industrial production by minimizing capital and operational expenditures.

Implementation Method 1

thermolytically fragmenting the sugar to provide a fragmentation product comprising the C1-C3 oxygenates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermolysis: Thermolysis

Implementation Method 2

For conversion of biomass into bio-oil by pyrolysis, several reactor configurations have been investigated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

cooling the fragmentation product downstream of the reactor to a cooling temperature of from 230°C to 390°C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentEP4580800B1Thermolytic fragmentation of sugars
Publication Date: 2026.04.01 HALDOR TOPSOE AS
  • EP4580800B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4580800B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4580800B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for thermolytic fragmentation of a sugar into C1-C3 oxygenates, comprising cooling the fragmentation product downstream of the reactor to a cooling temperature of from 230°C to 390°C and then separating solids from the fragmentation product cooled to the cooling temperature. The present invention also relates to a system for performing the thermolytic fragmentation of a sugar into C1-C3 oxygenates. The method and the system are suitable for industrial scale production.