Sulfate-Free Surfactant System for Personal Care Formulations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current personal care compositions containing sulfate-containing surfactants face issues such as skin and scalp irritation, oil stripping, and the challenge of maintaining viscosity, foaming properties, and conditioning without using large amounts of surfactants, which can increase costs and tolerance risks.

Innovation Solution

A sulfate-free personal care composition comprising a surfactant system of methyl oleoyl taurate, isethionate, and alkoxylated sulfosuccinate, along with a conditioning agent, which achieves acceptable viscosity, foaming properties, and conditioning without the need for excessive surfactant amounts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If sulfate-containing surfactants (SLS, SLES, ALS, ALES) are used in personal care compositions, then satisfactory cleansing and foaming properties are achieved at low cost, but skin and scalp irritation and oil stripping occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost and ease of formulationVSAvoidskin and scalp irritation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the surfactant system by replacing sulfate-containing surfactants with sulfate-free alternatives (amino acid-based surfactants like sodium cocoyl glycinate, sodium lauroyl sarcosinate, and their derivatives). This parameter change maintains cleansing and foaming functionality while eliminating the harmful irritation effects, directly resolving the contradiction between cost/ease of manufacture and skin safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite surfactant systems that combine multiple sulfate-free surfactants (amino acid-based anionic surfactants with amphoteric or nonionic surfactants) to achieve synergistic effects. This composite approach maintains satisfactory cleansing, foaming, and conditioning properties without the harmful effects of sulfate-containing surfactants, resolving the contradiction while preserving overall performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Quantity of substance

If sulfate-containing surfactants are used, then satisfactory cleansing and foaming properties are achieved, but viscosity control becomes difficult without excessive salt addition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleansing and foaming effectivenessVSAvoidviscosity stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the rheological parameters of the composition by using amino acid-based surfactants that inherently provide better viscosity stability. These surfactants form more stable micellar structures that maintain consistent viscosity across different concentrations and conditions, eliminating the need for excessive salt addition and resolving the contradiction between cleansing effectiveness and viscosity stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces amino acid-based surfactants as intermediary substances that mediate between the cleansing function and viscosity control. These surfactants serve dual roles: providing effective cleansing and foaming while simultaneously acting as viscosity modifiers that stabilize the composition, thus resolving the contradiction without requiring additional thickening agents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If large amounts of surfactants are used to achieve desired foam volume and quality in sulfate-free compositions, then foaming properties improve, but cost increases and tolerance risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoaming propertiesVSAvoidsurfactant amount
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite surfactant systems combining amino acid-based anionic surfactants with amphoteric surfactants (like cocamidopropyl betaine) or nonionic surfactants. This composite formulation creates synergistic effects where the combination of different surfactant types produces superior foam volume and quality at lower total surfactant concentrations, directly resolving the contradiction between foaming performance and surfactant quantity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the surfactant concentration parameters by optimizing the ratio and concentration of different sulfate-free surfactants in the composite system. This optimized parameter configuration achieves desired foaming properties with reduced total surfactant content, lowering both cost and tolerance risks while maintaining effective foam generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11129786B2Sulfate-free personal care compositions and methods for using such compositions
Publication Date: 2021.09.28 SPECIALTY OPERATIONS FRANCE
  • US11129786B2 patent drawing
  • US11129786B2 patent drawing
  • US11129786B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to sulfate-free aqueous personal care composition comprising a surfactant system comprising at least one methyl oleoyl taurate, one isethionate and one alkoxylated sulfosuccinate, and from about 0.2 pbw to about 15 pbw of a conditioning agent. It is also directed toward the use of such a composition for washing keratin substrates, in particular the hair or the scalp.