Sulfide Scavenging Aggregate for Landfill Gas Wells

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for removing hydrogen sulfide from landfills are costly and inefficient, leading to decreased methane gas purity, odor issues, and environmental concerns due to incomplete sulfide removal and high operational expenses.

Innovation Solution

Integration of low-cost metal oxides, such as iron oxide, into wellheads and piping systems within landfills to react with hydrogen sulfide and convert it into stable metal sulfides, thereby removing the noxious gas and increasing methane gas purity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional sulfide abatement systems (scrubber beds) are used to remove hydrogen sulfide, then sulfide removal effectiveness is improved, but operational costs and maintenance expenses increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen sulfide removal effectivenessVSAvoidoperational costs and maintenance expenses
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The iron oxide aggregate performs sulfide removal automatically through passive chemical reaction with hydrogen sulfide gas as it passes through the wellbore. The system requires no external power, control systems, or manual intervention - the iron oxide naturally reacts with sulfides to form iron sulfide, providing self-sustaining sulfide abatement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The iron oxide aggregate is a low-cost material that can be easily replaced when depleted. Rather than investing in expensive, complex scrubber systems requiring ongoing maintenance, the invention uses inexpensive iron oxide that can be replenished by simply adding more aggregate to the wellbore, significantly reducing operational expenses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Quantity of substance

If scrubber beds and sulfide abatement systems are deployed to capture methane and remove hydrogen sulfide, then gas purity is improved, but capital costs and manpower requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethane gas purityVSAvoidcapital costs and manpower requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts only the essential sulfide removal function from complex scrubber systems and implements it through simple iron oxide aggregate placed directly in the wellbore. This eliminates the need for expensive scrubber equipment, control systems, and associated infrastructure, achieving sulfide removal with minimal capital investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the approach from mechanical/chemical processing systems to a simple passive chemical reaction system. By utilizing the natural reactivity of iron oxide with hydrogen sulfide, the system achieves effective sulfide removal without the complex equipment and operational infrastructure traditionally required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If iron oxide systems are used to remove hydrogen sulfide, then sulfide removal reliability is improved, but capacity constraints and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfide removal reliabilityVSAvoidcapacity constraints and operational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to be dynamically replenishable - when iron oxide becomes depleted and converts to iron sulfide, additional iron oxide aggregate can be added to the wellbore to restore sulfide removal capacity. This dynamic replenishment approach maintains reliable sulfide removal over extended periods without the capacity constraints of fixed-size scrubber systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces operational costs, enhances methane gas value, minimizes odor and environmental issues, and provides a cost-effective solution for hydrogen sulfide removal, maintaining the stability of the metal sulfides within the anoxic landfill environment.

Implementation Method 1

A reactive structural component may be identified comprising a metal oxide. The hydrogen sulfide may contact the structural component to produce a metal sulfide.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

Some of the most reliable systems to remove hydrogen sulfide utilize forms of iron oxides to capture the gas as ferrous sulfide.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation-reduction reaction: Redox Reactions

Data Source

PatentUS20240299879A1Sulfide scavenging aggregate for the construction of landfill gas wells
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 HERITAGE RESEARCH GROUP LLC
  • US20240299879A1 patent drawing
  • US20240299879A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In preferred embodiments, the present disclosure relates to wells and methods of using the same. The disclosure refers to a method for reducing noxious gas from a location. A location containing hydrogen sulfide may be identified. The well may be packed with a reactive structural component composed at least partially of a metal oxide. The well may be inserted into the location containing hydrogen sulfide. A gaseous mixture is extracted from the location. The reactive structural component reacts with the hydrogen sulfide to remove it from the gaseous mixture being extract. A metal sulfide is a byproduct of this process. Often, the location may be a landfill. The metal oxide may be iron oxide. The gas being extracted may be methane.