Sulfonated Polyoxadiazole Fiber Dyeability via Controlled Sulfonation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for preparing polyoxadiazole polymers often result in unspecific sulfonation and lack an efficient process for producing dyeable copolymers and articles, such as fibers, due to excessive use of sulfuric acid and high temperatures which can lead to block copolymer formation instead of random distribution of repeat units.

Innovation Solution

A process involving controlled amounts of sulfur trioxide and hydrazine sulfate, with specific temperature management to achieve a random distribution of repeat units in sulfonated polyoxadiazole copolymers, allowing for the production of fibers with improved dyeability, using a two-step reaction with controlled additions of oleum and subsequent fiber spinning and treatment processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If excessive sulfuric acid and high temperatures are used in the synthesis of polyoxadiazole polymers, then the polymerization reaction proceeds rapidly, but unspecific sulfonation occurs and block copolymer formation is promoted instead of random distribution of repeat units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolymerization reaction rateVSAvoiddistribution uniformity of repeat units
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the concentration of sulfuric acid (using 65-98% ranges instead of excessive amounts) and temperature (maintaining specific ranges during different reaction stages) to achieve random copolymer formation while avoiding unspecific sulfonation. This resolves the contradiction by optimizing reaction parameters to balance reaction rate with structural uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses controlled amounts of sulfur trioxide (2-6 molar equivalents based on hydrazine) rather than excessive sulfuric acid, and employs a two-stage reaction process where the first stage uses limited SO3 to form the polymer backbone, and the second stage adds remaining SO3. This partial action approach prevents oversulfonation and block copolymer formation while maintaining acceptable reaction rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Manufacturing precision

If controlled amounts of sulfur trioxide and specific temperature management are used, then random distribution of repeat units is achieved in sulfonated polyoxadiazole copolymers, but the process complexity increases with two-step reaction and controlled additions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverandom distribution of repeat unitsVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the polymerization process into two distinct stages: Stage 1 uses limited sulfur trioxide (2-3 molar equivalents) at controlled temperatures to form the polyoxadiazole backbone with random repeat unit distribution, and Stage 2 adds the remaining sulfur trioxide (3-6 molar equivalents) to complete sulfonation. This segmentation allows precise control over the random copolymer structure while managing process complexity through systematic stepwise addition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by first forming the polyoxadiazole polymer backbone with controlled random distribution of aromatic acid repeat units before completing the sulfonation. The first stage establishes the random copolymer structure, and the second stage completes the sulfonation, ensuring the random distribution is preserved while achieving the desired sulfonated product.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If non-sulfonated polyoxadiazole fibers are produced, then the fiber structure is simple, but the dyeability is poor or nonexistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiber structure simplicityVSAvoiddyeability deficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the potential harm of sulfonation (which can cause structural complexity and processing difficulties) into a benefit by precisely controlling the sulfonation degree and distribution. The sulfonate groups introduced during controlled polymerization serve as dye binding sites, transforming what could be a complicating factor into the key enabler for excellent dyeability, achieving K/S values exceeding 12.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process results in sulfonated polyoxadiazole fibers with enhanced dyeability, as measured by K/S values exceeding 12, indicating improved color uptake and depth, compared to non-sulfonated polyoxadiazole fibers which show no dyeability.

Implementation Method 1

condensation polymers comprising polyoxadiazoles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation reaction:

Data Source

PatentEP2094763B1Polymers and fibers formed therefrom
Publication Date: 2013.03.27 EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO
  • EP2094763B1 patent drawing
  • EP2094763B1 patent drawing
  • EP2094763B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Sulfonated polyoxadiazole polymers containing groups selected from Formulae Ib, Ic, Id or Ia.