Sulfur-Containing Compounds in Cellulose Hydrolysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The recalcitrance of cellulose towards hydrolysis for glucose production is a significant challenge due to its natural resistance, leading to high enzyme costs and contamination issues during enzymatic hydrolysis, which complicates the conversion of biomass into glucose for fermentation.

Innovation Solution

Exposing biomass-derived cellulose to cellulase enzymes and an external sulfur-containing compound, such as sulfur dioxide or lignosulfonates, to deter bacterial and yeast contamination during hydrolysis, while also functioning as an enzyme surfactant to assist in the hydrolysis process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If enzymatic hydrolysis is performed for glucose production, then cellulose can be converted to glucose, but bacterial and yeast contamination occurs during the long hydrolysis process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglucose productionVSAvoidbacterial and yeast contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by adding sulfur dioxide or sulfur-containing compounds at the beginning of the enzymatic hydrolysis process to prevent contamination before it occurs. The sulfur dioxide is introduced in the pretreatment or initial hydrolysis stage to create an antimicrobial environment that deters bacterial and yeast growth throughout the extended hydrolysis period, thereby protecting the glucose production process without requiring separate sterilization steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If severe chemical treatment is applied to make cellulose reactive, then hydrolysis efficiency improves, but integrity of cellulose and yields of hemicellulose and lignin are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrolysis efficiencyVSAvoidcellulose integrity and hemicellulose/lignin yields
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using sulfur dioxide to modify the chemical environment during hydrolysis rather than severely treating the cellulose structure itself. The sulfur dioxide creates a more reactive and accessible cellulose state through mild chemical interaction, improving enzyme accessibility and hydrolysis efficiency while maintaining the structural integrity of cellulose and preserving hemicellulose and lignin yields, thus avoiding the harsh effects of severe chemical pretreatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If long hydrolysis time is used to convert cellulose to glucose, then complete hydrolysis is achieved, but contamination risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrolysis completenessVSAvoidhydrolysis duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of extended hydrolysis time (which normally increases contamination risk) into a benefit by using sulfur dioxide to create an antimicrobial environment. The long hydrolysis duration required for complete cellulose conversion is maintained to achieve high glucose yields, while the sulfur dioxide simultaneously prevents contamination throughout this extended period, effectively converting the time-related contamination risk into a controlled process where completeness is achieved without penalty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces contamination and enhances the efficiency of cellulose hydrolysis, leading to improved glucose production yields and lower enzyme costs, thereby simplifying the biomass conversion process.

Implementation Method 1

exposing the biomass-derived cellulose to (i) cellulase enzymes, to hydrolyze the cellulose to glucose

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 2

an external (i.e., not derived from the starting biomass) sulfur-containing compound, to deter bacterial and/or yeast contamination during cellulose hydrolysis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAntimicrobial action: Preservative

Implementation Method 3

When the sulfur-containing compound includes lignosulfonates, the lignosulfonates may also function as an enzyme surfactant to assist hydrolysis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurfactant action: Surfactant

Data Source

PatentUS11155846B2Methods for reducing contamination during enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass-derived cellulose
Publication Date: 2021.10.26 GRANBIO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC

AI summary

Some variations provide a method of enzymatically converting biomass-derived cellulose to glucose, comprising exposing the biomass-derived cellulose to (i) cellulase enzymes, to hydrolyze the cellulose to glucose; and (ii) an external sulfur-containing compound, to deter bacterial and/or yeast contamination during cellulose hydrolysis. In some embodiments, the sulfur-containing compound includes sulfur dioxide or lignosulfonates. When the sulfur-containing compound includes lignosulfonates, the lignosulfonates may also function as an enzyme surfactant to assist hydrolysis, in addition to deterring bacterial and/or yeast growth/contamination. This method may be applied to cellulose-rich solids obtained from the AVAP® fractionation process, the GREEN POWER+® pretreatment process, or any other source of cellulose-rich solids.