Sulfur Active Electrode Material Using Methacrylonitrile Polymer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for manufacturing sulfur-based active electrode materials for non-aqueous electrolyte secondary batteries are costly due to the high expense of specific polyacrylonitrile powders and have limitations in cyclability when using diene rubber as a starting material.

Innovation Solution

A sulfur-based active electrode material is prepared by compounding sulfur with a polymer containing methacrylonitrile as a monomer component, which is then baked with a conductive additive under controlled conditions to enhance charging and discharging capacity and cyclability, using an inexpensive polymer and improving the polymer's structure through copolymerization and vulcanization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If polyacrylonitrile with specific quality is used as starting material, then battery performance is improved, but manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive polyacrylonitrile with inexpensive polyvinylidene fluoride as the binder material. This substitution maintains battery performance while dramatically reducing raw material costs, directly resolving the contradiction between reliability and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the particle size distribution of sulfur to D10=3.0 μm, D50=6.0 μm, and D90=9.0 μm, and controls the mixing ratio of conductive additives. These parameter optimizations ensure high battery performance using inexpensive materials, resolving the cost-performance contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If diene rubber is used as starting material, then manufacturing cost decreases, but cyclability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidcyclability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses polyvinylidene fluoride, an inexpensive polymer, as the binder instead of expensive polyacrylonitrile or diene rubber. This substitution maintains low manufacturing cost while achieving excellent cyclability through optimized processing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent controls the particle size distribution of sulfur and the mixing ratios of conductive additives to achieve optimal electrode performance. These parameter optimizations ensure high cyclability using inexpensive materials, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing cost and duration of action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If sulfur content is increased to improve capacity, then charging and discharging capacity increases, but electrode structure stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging and discharging capacityVSAvoidelectrode structure stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the particle size distribution of sulfur (D10=3.0 μm, D50=6.0 μm, D90=9.0 μm) and controls the mixing ratio of conductive additives. These parameter optimizations allow high sulfur content (improving capacity) while maintaining electrode structure stability through better distribution and contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite electrode structure combining sulfur, polyvinylidene fluoride binder, and conductive additives in optimized ratios. This composite structure maintains stability even with high sulfur content, resolving the contradiction between quantity of substance and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The approach results in a non-aqueous electrolyte secondary battery with improved charging and discharging capacity and cyclability, while being cost-effective due to the use of an inexpensive polymer and optimized sulfur content, characterized by specific Raman spectrum peaks.

Implementation Method 1

a sulfur-based active electrode material prepared by baking a starting material comprising sulfur and a polymer including methacrylonitrile as a monomer component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVulcanization: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

the polymer is a copolymer comprising two or more monomer components including methacrylonitrile

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCopolymerization: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP3716363B1Sulfur-based active material
Publication Date: 2023.09.20 SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES LTD
  • EP3716363B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3716363B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3716363B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a sulfur-based active material prepared using an inexpensive polymer material as a starting material and a method of preparing the sulfur-based active material. A non-aqueous electrolyte secondary battery such as a lithium-ion secondary battery provided with an electrode comprising the sulfur-based active material has a large charging and discharging capacity and an excellent cyclability.