Sump Pump Control Cycles to Limit Impeller Corrosion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sump pump systems lack the ability to automatically detect impending failures and remedy them, leading to potential water damage and insurance losses due to unanticipated failures.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that activates the sump pump at regular intervals to reduce exposure of the impeller to standing water, using sensors to detect water levels and conditions, and employing a mechanical shaker to address blockages, thereby extending the lifespan of the sump pump and preventing corrosion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the sump pump is continuously activated to remove water, then water removal efficiency is improved, but the impeller exposure to standing water increases causing corrosion and reducing lifespan

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater removal efficiencyVSAvoidsump pump lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sump pump controller implements periodic activation cycles where the pump runs for a specified duration and then shuts off for a predetermined period, even when water continues to accumulate. This periodic operation allows the impeller to be exposed to air during the off-cycle, reducing corrosion from continuous submersion while still maintaining water removal capability during active cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary protective action by scheduling pump shutdowns before corrosion can significantly degrade the impeller. The controller proactively manages pump operation to minimize exposure time, and the mechanical shaker is activated in advance to clear blockages before they can cause failures, thereby extending pump lifespan preemptively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the sump pump is deactivated to extend lifespan, then impeller corrosion is reduced, but water accumulation increases raising flood risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesump pump lifespanVSAvoidflood risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The sump pump controller continuously monitors water level through sensors and uses this feedback to determine when to activate or deactivate the pump. When water levels approach dangerous thresholds, the controller activates the pump to remove water, and when levels are safe, it deactivates the pump to reduce corrosion. This closed-loop feedback system balances lifespan extension with flood prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts pump operation based on real-time conditions rather than using fixed on/off schedules. The controller modulates pump activity according to water accumulation rates, environmental conditions, and pump health status, optimizing the balance between removing water to prevent flooding and limiting operation to extend pump lifespan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If sensors and mechanical shakers are added to detect and remedy failures, then system reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem component count
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sump pump controller is designed as a multi-functional device that integrates water level monitoring, pump control, mechanical shaker activation, and failure detection capabilities into a single unit. By consolidating these functions into one controller rather than using separate dedicated devices for each function, the system achieves improved reliability through comprehensive monitoring while minimizing the increase in overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the control functions for the sump pump and the mechanical shaker into a single integrated controller. This consolidation allows the controller to coordinate pump operation and shaker activation based on unified sensor input, reducing the number of separate control devices needed while maintaining the ability to detect and respond to various failure modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11788535B1Systems and methods for manipulating control of sump pumps to extend lifespans of sump pumps
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US11788535B1 patent drawing
  • US11788535B1 patent drawing
  • US11788535B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Example systems and methods for manipulating control of sump pumps in order to extend lifespans of the sump pumps are disclosed. An example method includes activating a sump pump a first time; deactivating the sump pump when a first current water level in a sump basin in which the sump pump is disposed reaches a first low-water mark; and determining, by one or more processors, a time since a last activation of the sump pump wherein the last activation occurred when the sump pump activated the first time. When the time satisfies a threshold, the method activates the sump pump at second time, determines, by one or more processors, a second current water level in the sump basin, and in response to determining that the second current water level in the sump basin is below a second low-water mark corresponding to a bottom of an impeller of the sump pump, deactivates the sump pump.