Sump Pump Control Using Machine Learning for Failure Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sump pump systems lack the ability to automatically detect impending failures or remedy them, often leading to unexpected water damage due to undetected issues such as motor malfunctions, blockages, or sensor failures.

Innovation Solution

Implementing adaptive learning and machine learning techniques in sump pump systems to predict conditions like water level, motor malfunction, or blockages using sensors for acceleration, vibration, and capacitance values, enabling proactive control and maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional sump pump control systems are used, then the system is simple and reliable, but the system cannot detect impending failures or predict water levels accurately

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model performs preliminary analysis of vibration patterns, acceleration data, and capacitance values to predict potential failures before they occur. The system proactively identifies trends indicating motor degradation, impeller issues, or blockages, allowing preventive maintenance before actual failure happens.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors (accelerometers, vibration sensors, capacitance sensors) act as intermediaries between the physical pump system and the control system. These sensors collect data that is processed by the machine learning model, which serves as an intermediary layer translating raw sensor data into predictive insights about pump health and water levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If machine learning models with multiple sensors are implemented, then prediction accuracy improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater level prediction accuracyVSAvoidsensor and processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it predicts water levels, detects motor malfunctions, identifies blockages, and monitors overall pump health. The same model processes data from multiple sensors (accelerometers, vibration sensors, capacitance sensors) to provide comprehensive system monitoring rather than dedicated systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple sensor types (acceleration sensors, vibration sensors, capacitance sensors) are merged into a unified data processing system. The machine learning model combines data from these different sensor sources to create a comprehensive view of pump operation and water level conditions, reducing the need for separate processing systems for each sensor type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If adaptive learning techniques are used to predict pump conditions, then failure prevention improves, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure prevention capabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model continuously analyzes sensor data in the background to build predictive insights before critical failures occur. By performing preliminary analysis of vibration patterns and acceleration data, the system identifies early signs of motor degradation or impeller issues, allowing preventive maintenance scheduling without disrupting pump operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensor data is constantly fed into the machine learning model, which updates its predictions and provides feedback about pump health status. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to changing conditions and improve prediction accuracy over time while maintaining real-time monitoring capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the ability to detect and prevent sump pump failures, reducing the risk of water damage by allowing for timely intervention and extending the lifespan of the pump and infrastructure.

Implementation Method 1

a second sensor, disposed in the sump basin, that is configured to detect motion or acceleration of the second sensor (e.g., an accelerometer or force sensor)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration detection: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

acceleration or vibration patterns detected in water, on a pump, or on a pipe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration detection: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS12359669B2Adaptive learning system for improving sump pump control
Publication Date: 2025.07.15 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US12359669B2 patent drawing
  • US12359669B2 patent drawing
  • US12359669B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sump pump system may implement adaptive learning and machine learning techniques to facilitate improved control of sump pumps. A sump pump system may implement the described techniques to generate, train, and/or implement a machine learning model that is capable of predicting or estimating one or more conditions of the sump pump system (e.g., water level in the basin, motor malfunction, stuck impeller, geyser effect, blocked outlet pipe, faulty level sensor/switch, faulty bearing, failure to engage pump at high-water mark, etc.) based on one or more detected input variables (e.g., acceleration or vibration patterns detected in water, on a pump, or on a pipe; capacitance values of water; audio signatures; electrical signatures, such as power or current draw; pump motor rotation speed; water pressure signatures or values, such as those detected at the bottom of a sump basin; etc.).