Super Controller Latency Distribution for SDN

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Software Defined Network (SDN) cross-domain services do not support deployment of services with end-to-end latency restrictions, as existing methods for latency distribution across autonomous systems are static and inappropriate, failing to adjust based on network and service status.

Innovation Solution

A method for establishing a forwarding path in a network using a super controller (SC) that manages multiple domain controllers (DCs), where the SC receives a service request, selects a latency distribution manner based on the service type, divides the latency into periods corresponding to each DC, and triggers each DC to establish a forwarding path segment, connecting them to form a customized latency path.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a static latency distribution method is used across autonomous systems, then the network structure is simple to manage, but the service cannot meet dynamic latency requirements of different services

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatency requirement adaptationVSAvoidcontroller management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the end-to-end latency requirement into multiple domain-specific latency requirements. The super controller divides the total latency budget into several parts, assigning each part to a specific domain controller based on service types and network conditions. This allows each domain to independently optimize its latency distribution while collectively meeting the overall service requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic latency distribution where the super controller continuously monitors network status and service requirements, adjusting latency allocations in real-time. Different service types (e.g., real-time video, file transfer) receive different latency distributions based on current network conditions, enabling the system to adapt to changing requirements without manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If a uniform latency distribution is applied to all domains, then the implementation is simple, but network utilization is not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork utilizationVSAvoidlatency distribution configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing each domain to have customized latency distribution characteristics based on its specific network conditions and service requirements. The super controller assigns different latency weights to different domains according to their capabilities and current status, enabling optimal local utilization while maintaining global coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes latency distribution parameters based on service types and network conditions. The super controller adjusts latency allocation parameters in real-time, transforming the static uniform distribution into a dynamic adaptive distribution that optimizes network utilization for different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Extent of automation

If manual latency distribution configuration is used, then the system is easy to understand, but it cannot respond to changing network status and service requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic latency distributionVSAvoidservice type identification and status monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the super controller continuously monitors network status, service performance, and domain conditions. Based on this feedback, the controller automatically adjusts latency distributions and reconfigures service paths to meet changing requirements, enabling the system to self-optimize without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automatic self-service through the super controller that autonomously performs latency distribution optimization. The controller automatically identifies service types, monitors network status, calculates optimal latency distributions, and configures domain controllers accordingly, reducing the need for manual operation while improving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11290568B2Method, controller, and system for establishing forwarding path in network
Publication Date: 2022.03.29 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US11290568B2 patent drawing
  • US11290568B2 patent drawing
  • US11290568B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The application discloses a method for establishing a forwarding path in a network, where the network includes a SC and a plurality of DCs, the SC manages the plurality of DCs, each of the plurality of DCs manages one domain, and the method includes: receiving, by the SC, a service request message; selecting, by the SC, a latency distribution manner based on the service request message; dividing, by the SC, a first latency into a plurality of latency periods; sending, by the SC, each of the plurality of latency periods to a DC corresponding to the latency period, and triggering each of the plurality of DCs to establish a forwarding path segment in the domain managed by the DC; and connecting, by the SC, the plurality of forwarding path segments established by the plurality of DCs, to form a forwarding path.