Super-Resolution Model Training With Validation-Based Early Stopping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Training super-resolution machine learning models is computationally expensive and requires significant resources, often leading to overfitting or underfitting due to limited and non-target domain training data, necessitating improvements in training efficiency and resource utilization.

Innovation Solution

Modify existing image generators to simultaneously generate correlated low-resolution and high-resolution image pairs, incorporating validation processes to terminate training when a predetermined rate of change threshold is met, thereby optimizing the training cycle and preventing overfitting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If super-resolution machine learning models are trained extensively on limited training data, then model performance may improve, but computational costs and resource requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidcomputational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements validation processes that provide feedback during training to monitor model performance and determine when training has converged. This feedback mechanism allows the system to stop training when performance thresholds are met, avoiding unnecessary computational resources while ensuring adequate model performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts training parameters such as the number of epochs and validation frequency based on observed performance trends. By changing these parameters adaptively, the system optimizes the balance between training depth and computational cost, preventing both overfitting and wasted resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If training data is limited and not from the target domain, then obtaining training data becomes easier, but model performance on target domain images deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining data availabilityVSAvoidmodel performance on target domain
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses validation data as an intermediary to bridge the gap between limited training data and target domain requirements. By validating on images that represent the target domain, the system ensures the model learns relevant features even when training data is insufficient or not from the exact target domain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs a training system that can handle multiple scenarios: training on synthetic or similar-domain data while validating on target domain data. This multi-functional approach allows the model to generalize effectively across different domains despite limitations in training data specificity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of energy

If training continues beyond convergence point, then computational resources are wasted, but stopping early may result in underfitting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational resource wasteVSAvoidmodel convergence accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The validation process provides continuous feedback on model performance during training. By monitoring validation loss and accuracy, the system can detect convergence and stop training at the optimal point, preventing both overfitting and underfitting while avoiding computational waste from excessive training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual determination of training completion with automated validation-based detection. This substitution of mechanical training continuation with intelligent validation feedback enables precise control over training duration, ensuring stopping occurs exactly when performance thresholds are met.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250371659A1Training processes for machine learning super-resolution models
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US20250371659A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371659A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371659A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for dynamically modifying the training of super-resolution models. In some instances, a set of training data is obtained that includes pairings of low-resolution and correlated high-resolution images. The training data is separated into a training group and a validation group. During a training cycle, a super-resolution model is applied to the training group over multiple epochs. After each epoch, the model is applied to the validation data to calculate a loss value. A rate of change in the loss value between the different epochs is determined, and a predetermined rate of change threshold is identified. The training cycle is terminated when the rate of change in the loss value meets or is less than the predetermined threshold.