Superblock Morphology Measurement Hierarchy Matrix

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing measurement methods for superblock morphology focus on single elements, lacking comprehensive and integral analysis of the hierarchical structure, which hinders the design of ideal block morphology.

Innovation Solution

A measurement method using a hierarchy matrix that considers both geometric scale and topological structure, categorizing perspectives into 'geometry' and 'configuration' and objects into 'network' and 'area', allowing for quantitative analysis and comparison of hierarchical structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing measurement methods focus on single elements, then measurement simplicity is maintained, but comprehensive analysis of hierarchical structure is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive analysis of hierarchical structureVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement system is segmented into four independent quadrants (network configuration, network geometry, area configuration, area geometry), each measuring a specific aspect of superblock morphology. This segmentation allows comprehensive hierarchical analysis while maintaining manageable complexity through modular measurement components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hierarchy matrix framework serves multiple functions simultaneously: it classifies measurement objects, organizes measurement perspectives, provides quantitative methods for different quadrants, and enables comprehensive hierarchical analysis. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by consolidating multiple measurement needs into a single unified system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If single element measurement is used, then measurement process is simple, but integrity and comprehensiveness of hierarchical structure study is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegrity of hierarchical structure analysisVSAvoidmeasurement process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement process is divided into four quadrants, each with specific measurement objectives and methods. This segmentation maintains operational simplicity within each quadrant while achieving comprehensive reliability across the entire hierarchical structure analysis through systematic coverage of all aspects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The framework provides quantitative methods and evaluation criteria for each quadrant that enable feedback on measurement results. This feedback mechanism ensures reliability by allowing verification and comparison of measurement data against established criteria, while the structured feedback process guides operators through the measurement procedure systematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If no specific calculation method is provided, then measurement flexibility is maintained, but design of ideal block morphology is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of block morphology designVSAvoidcalculation method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The framework provides specific calculation methods for different quadrants that transform qualitative morphological characteristics into quantitative parameters. By changing the measurement approach to quantitative analysis with defined calculation methods, the precision of block morphology design is improved while the systematic parameter approaches keep the complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The framework replaces complex qualitative assessment with quantitative mathematical methods for each quadrant. This substitution of mechanical/qualitative evaluation with mathematical/quantitative approaches enables precise measurement and design control, while the modular mathematical methods maintain clarity and reduce overall complexity through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250131151A1Measurement method for hierarchical structure of urban superblock
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 SOUTHEAST UNIV
  • US20250131151A1 patent drawing
  • US20250131151A1 patent drawing
  • US20250131151A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure discloses a measurement method for a hierarchical structure of a superblock, which belongs to the technical field of urban design, and includes the following steps of: according to categories of urban block morphology studies, determining “geometry” and “configuration” as cognition perspectives, determining that measurement objects include “network” and “area”, establishing a hierarchy matrix formed by intersection of “perspective” and “object”, dividing morphological characteristic measurement of superblocks into four quadrants, providing an indicator system of block morphological hierarchical structures and a calculation method thereof, and performing visual comparison and analysis on superblocks. The present disclosure provides a scientific method for further exploring the internal mechanism and rule of the block morphology, provides a technical tool for the current situation evaluation of the urban built environment and the future practice optimization direction, and promotes the development of micro-level digital urban design methods.