Superconducting Accelerometer Magnetic Levitation Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional accelerometers rely on mechanical springs, which can be a significant obstacle in precise acceleration measurement due to their mechanical nature and potential interference, whereas superconducting materials exhibit unique properties such as zero electrical resistance and diamagnetic behavior, offering a potential for magnetic levitation without mechanical coupling.

Innovation Solution

A superconducting accelerometer utilizing a solenoid levitation coil to magnetically levitate a test mass made of a superconductor, coupled with a measurement superconductor coil and a SQUID sensor to detect changes in distance and convert them into voltage signals, eliminating the need for mechanical springs and enhancing precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If mechanical springs are used to support the test mass, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the measurement precision deteriorates due to mechanical interference and spring characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceleration measurement precisionVSAvoidlevitation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical spring support system with a magnetic levitation system using a solenoid coil and superconducting test mass. This substitution eliminates mechanical contact and spring interference, thereby improving acceleration measurement precision while accepting increased system complexity through the introduction of electromagnetic components and cryogenic requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state of the test mass to superconducting state by cooling it below its critical temperature. This parameter change enables magnetic levitation without mechanical contact, improving measurement precision. The superconducting state provides stable levitation forces and eliminates friction and mechanical wear associated with traditional spring-based systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If a solenoid levitation coil is used to magnetically levitate the test mass, then mechanical spring interference is eliminated, but the device complexity increases due to the need for superconducting materials and cryogenic systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceleration measurement precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical spring support system with a magnetic levitation system using a solenoid coil and superconducting test mass. This substitution eliminates mechanical contact and spring interference, thereby improving acceleration measurement precision while accepting increased system complexity through the introduction of electromagnetic components and cryogenic requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material strategies by combining superconducting materials (for the test mass and measurement coil) with conventional materials (aluminum can, ceramic spacers, epoxy resin). This composite approach allows the system to benefit from the unique properties of superconductors while managing manufacturing complexity through the use of readily available conventional materials for structural and support components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Stability of the object's composition

If superconducting materials are used for the test mass and measurement coil, then the levitation stability is improved, but the cost and manufacturing difficulty increase due to cryogenic requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelevitation stabilityVSAvoidcryogenic system manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state of the test mass to superconducting state by cooling it below its critical temperature. This parameter change enables magnetic levitation without mechanical contact, improving measurement precision. The superconducting state provides stable levitation forces and eliminates friction and mechanical wear associated with traditional spring-based systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a cryogenic environment using liquid nitrogen or other cryogenic fluids to maintain the superconducting state of the test mass and measurement coil. This controlled low-temperature environment ensures stable levitation while isolating the superconducting components from ambient conditions that would cause instability. The inert cryogenic atmosphere protects the delicate superconducting materials while enabling their unique properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for precise acceleration measurement by leveraging the stable magnetic levitation of a superconducting test mass, minimizing interference and improving sensitivity through the use of a pancake-type spiral measurement superconductor coil and SQUID sensor, effectively removing the limitations of mechanical springs.

Implementation Method 1

a solenoid levitation coil disposed to surround a portion of the body part and adapted to magnetically levitate the test mass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic levitation: Maglev

Implementation Method 2

a test mass including a rod-shaped body part and a disc-shaped coupling part connected to the body part, the test mass being made of a superconductor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuperconductivity: Superconductivity

Implementation Method 3

A superconductor exhibits zero electrical resistance, and its internal magnetic field becomes zero. The latter is called Meissner effect, which is repulsive to an external magnetic field, i.e., has a diamagnetic property.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMeissner effect: Meissner Effect

Implementation Method 4

a measurement superconductor coil disposed at at least one side of an upper portion and a lower portion of the coupling part; and a SQUID sensor adapted to detect current depending on variation of a distance between the test mass and the measurement superconductor coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 5

a SQUID sensor adapted to detect current depending on variation of a distance between the test mass and the measurement superconductor coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSQUID detection:

Data Source

PatentUS9322838B2Superconducting accelerometer, acceleration measuring apparatus, and acceleration measuring method
Publication Date: 2016.04.26 KOREA RES INST OF STANDARDS & SCI
  • US9322838B2 patent drawing
  • US9322838B2 patent drawing
  • US9322838B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a superconducting accelerometer, an acceleration measurement device, and an acceleration measurement method. The superconducting accelerometer includes a test mass including a rod-shaped body part, a disc-shaped coupling part connected to the body part, the test mass being made of a superconductor; a solenoid levitation coil disposed to surround a portion of the body part and adapted to magnetically levitate the test mass, the solenoid levitation coil being made of a superconductor; a measurement superconductor coil disposed at at least one side of an upper portion and a lower portion of the coupling part; and a SQUID sensor adapted to detect current depending on variation of a distance between the test mass and the measurement superconductor coil.