Active Superframe Interleaving for Network Coexistence

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

When multiple networks operate in close proximity, they often face interference due to sharing the same operating channel, especially when the number of networks exceeds the available predefined channels, leading to a lack of available channels for new networks to use without causing mutual interference.

Innovation Solution

Implementing active superframe interleaving between networks, where one network's hub can request and coordinate with another to adjust their active superframe lengths and inactive durations, allowing them to share the same channel without interference by interleaving their active transmission periods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If multiple networks operate on the same predefined channel set, then channel availability for new networks is limited, but using different channels for each network causes interference when the number of networks exceeds available channels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of networksVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the channel usage in time by dividing operation into active superframes and inactive superframes. Multiple networks share the same channel by transmitting in different time segments (their respective active superframes), thereby avoiding simultaneous transmission and interference while allowing more networks to coexist on limited channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic active and inactive superframes for each network. By rhythmically alternating between active transmission periods and inactive listening periods, networks create predictable time patterns that allow other networks to transmit during their inactive periods, reducing interference while maximizing channel utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Ease of operation

If networks use the same predefined channel, then channel hunting is simplified, but channel capacity is insufficient when too many networks operate simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel selectionVSAvoidnetwork throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the superframe structure dynamic and adjustable. Networks can modify their active superframe lengths and inactive durations based on traffic conditions and coexistence requirements, allowing flexible adaptation to changing network densities while maintaining simple channel selection through predefined channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If a hub maintains continuous active superframes, then network responsiveness is maximized, but other networks cannot share the channel without causing interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork responsivenessVSAvoidchannel sharing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces periodic inactive superframes into the continuous operation cycle. During inactive superframes, hubs stop transmitting and listen for other networks, creating time windows for channel sharing while maintaining rapid responsiveness during active superframes. This periodic structure enables both high-speed operation and multi-network coexistence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9374831B2Network coexistence through active superframe interleaving
Publication Date: 2016.06.21 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US9374831B2 patent drawing
  • US9374831B2 patent drawing
  • US9374831B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention provide coexistence among independent networks through active superframe interleaving. Network hubs and devices exchange signals over a selected channel only during active superframes of their network. Network hubs broadcast coexistence information during their active superframes. A hub of network B desiring to use the selected channel first attempts to fit its active superframes within network A's inactive superframes, if available. If network A is not providing inactive superframes, then the network B hub determines whether network A is willing to coexist using active superframe interleaving on the channel. If so, the network B hub sends an interleave request message to the network A hub, which may accept the message and send back an interleave response message. The network A hub then offers new inactive superframes, and the network B hub adapts the transmissions and receptions of network B to fit within these inactive superframes.