Super-frame Structure for Dynamic Spectrum Sharing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless systems face inefficiencies in spectrum sharing due to bandwidth contention and RF interference, leading to suboptimal use of the limited electromagnetic spectrum, and existing solutions fail to enable dynamic negotiation and efficient switching between frequencies and protocols.

Innovation Solution

A super-frame structure is introduced in wireless networks, comprising frames with a super-frame preamble, control header, data portion, and self-coexistence windows, allowing for efficient spectrum sharing through coexistence beacons and contention-based access, enabling negotiation and coordination between overlapping wireless systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If wireless systems share the electromagnetic spectrum in the same physical area, then spectrum utilization efficiency improves, but bandwidth contention and RF interference increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectrum utilization efficiencyVSAvoidbandwidth contention and RF interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the spectrum sharing process into distinct super-frame structures with specific time slots for different functions. Each super-frame contains control headers, data portions, and coexistence windows that are separated in time, allowing multiple wireless systems to share the spectrum without continuous interference. This temporal segmentation resolves the contradiction by organizing spectrum access into structured intervals rather than continuous contention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic coexistence windows within super-frames that occur at regular intervals. These periodic windows allow wireless systems to negotiate spectrum access rights and exchange coexistence information systematically. By using periodic action rather than continuous negotiation, the system achieves efficient spectrum sharing while minimizing ongoing interference and contention overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Adaptability or versatility

If wireless systems negotiate spectrum access dynamically, then adaptability to different conditions improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic spectrum negotiation capabilityVSAvoidnegotiation protocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces standardized coexistence beacons and control headers as intermediary elements that facilitate spectrum negotiation. These intermediaries carry pre-defined information elements about spectrum usage, system types, and access rights. By using these standardized intermediaries rather than direct complex negotiations between all systems, the patent achieves dynamic adaptability while reducing overall system complexity through abstraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes within the coexistence beacon structure to convey negotiation information efficiently. Rather than complex message exchanges, systems modify specific parameters in the beacon (such as spectrum access rights, timing information, and system identification) to dynamically adapt to different conditions. This parameter-based approach provides adaptability while maintaining relatively simple protocol structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If coexistence beacons are transmitted in every frame, then real-time coordination between networks improves, but overhead and spectrum waste increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time coordination reliabilityVSAvoidtransmission overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transmits coexistence beacons periodically within specific windows of the super-frame structure rather than in every single frame. These periodic coexistence windows occur at strategically chosen intervals that maintain real-time coordination capability while significantly reducing the frequency of beacon transmissions. This periodic approach balances reliability requirements with overhead reduction by updating coordination information only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent includes coexistence window reservation maps in the super-frame control headers that preliminarily allocate future coexistence window opportunities. By预先 reserving these time slots and informing all systems in advance, the patent reduces the need for frequent real-time beacon transmissions, as systems can plan their access based on the pre-announced reservation pattern, thereby reducing overhead while maintaining coordination reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8325765B2Super-frame structure for dynamic spectrum sharing in wireless networks
Publication Date: 2012.12.04 STMICROELECTRONICS INT NV
  • US8325765B2 patent drawing
  • US8325765B2 patent drawing
  • US8325765B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A coexistence communications method for use between wireless networks includes adopting a super-frame structure for use in a wireless network having a plurality of frames, wherein a first frame includes a super-frame preamble, a super-frame control header, a data portion, and a regular self-coexistence window, an intermediate frame includes an OFDM symbol, a data portion, and a regular self-coexistence window, and a last frame includes an OFDM symbol, a data portion, and a joining self-coexistence window, using the self-coexistence windows to exchange inter-wireless network co-existence messages, and using a last reserved self-coexistence window to announce intra-wireless network negotiation decisions.