Superlative Selection in Unordered Lists via Partial Buffer Sorting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for determining multiple largest or smallest values in an unordered list are inefficient, requiring significant time and memory usage, and often modify the original data or require additional memory to maintain its unsorted state.

Innovation Solution

A method involving copying the k first elements from an unordered list to a result buffer, comparing subsequent elements to the largest or smallest in the buffer, and replacing them if necessary, with the buffer being sorted to maintain efficiency, allowing for the determination of k largest or smallest elements in a single pass through the data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the entire unordered list is sorted to determine multiple largest or smallest values, then the values can be determined accurately, but the process is time consuming and requires additional memory to preserve the original list

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of determining largest/smallest valuesVSAvoidtime to sort the list
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the k largest or smallest values from the unordered list using a selection algorithm, rather than sorting the entire list. This is achieved by maintaining a buffer of k elements and comparing incoming elements against this buffer, extracting only the necessary information (k superlative values) without the overhead of full sorting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs partial sorting by maintaining a partially sorted buffer of k elements rather than fully sorting the entire list of n elements. The buffer remains sorted during the scan, allowing efficient insertion of new elements, but this partial ordering is sufficient to identify the k superlative values without the expense of complete list sorting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If the entire unordered list is sorted to determine multiple largest or smallest values, then the values can be determined accurately, but additional memory is required to copy the list

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of determining largest/smallest valuesVSAvoidmemory usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the k superlative values and stores them in a small buffer of size k, rather than copying or sorting the entire list of n elements. This extraction approach requires minimal additional memory (only k elements) while still providing accurate results for the largest or smallest values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by maintaining a sorted buffer of only k elements with specific properties (the k largest or smallest values found so far) rather than applying sorting to the entire list. This localized sorted structure uses minimal memory while providing the necessary information for accurate determination of superlative values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the single smallest or largest value is determined repeatedly by searching the entire list each time, then the values can be determined, but the process is inefficient and requires considerable time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of determining largest/smallest valuesVSAvoidefficiency of finding multiple values
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains a continuously updated sorted buffer of k elements throughout the single pass through the list. As each new element is processed, it is immediately compared against the buffer and inserted in the correct position if it belongs among the k superlative values. This continuous maintenance of the sorted buffer eliminates the need for repeated searches and provides all k values in one efficient pass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary sorting of the first k elements to initialize the buffer before scanning the remaining list. This preliminary action creates a ready-to-use sorted structure that enables efficient comparison and insertion of subsequent elements, avoiding the need for repeated full-list searches for each superlative value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If the single smallest or largest value is determined repeatedly by searching the entire list each time, then the values can be determined, but the original data must be modified or copied requiring additional memory

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of determining largest/smallest valuesVSAvoidmemory usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the k superlative values into a separate buffer of size k without modifying the original list. This extraction is performed by comparing elements against the buffer and inserting new values only when they belong among the top k, requiring minimal additional memory while preserving the original data integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by maintaining a sorted buffer of only k elements with specific properties (the k largest or smallest values) rather than copying or modifying the entire list. This localized approach uses minimal additional memory (proportional to k, not n) while providing accurate determination of superlative values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7908283B2Finding superlatives in an unordered list
Publication Date: 2011.03.15 RED HAT INC
  • US7908283B2 patent drawing
  • US7908283B2 patent drawing
  • US7908283B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The k first elements from an unordered list of n total elements are copied to a result buffer, wherein k is a value smaller than n. The k first elements in the result buffer are sorted. Each subsequent element in the unordered list is compared to elements in the result buffer. If the subsequent element belongs in the result buffer, a current element in the result buffer is replaced with the subsequent element. The elements in the result buffer are then resorted.