Superlattice Property Calculation via k-Space Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for calculating absorption coefficients and other properties in type-II superlattices are computationally intensive due to the need for three-dimensional integration over k-space, requiring extensive diagonalization of the Hamiltonian, which is time-consuming and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A computationally efficient method that approximates electron and hole energy dispersions and optical matrix elements at specific values of k and φ, reducing the number of diagonalizations needed, allowing for faster evaluation of superlattice properties like absorption coefficients and radiative efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If three-dimensional integration over k-space is performed to calculate absorption coefficients and other properties in type-II superlattices, then measurement precision is improved, but computing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of absorption coefficient calculationVSAvoidcomputer run time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The three-dimensional integration over k-space is segmented into separate integrations over kz and (kx, ky) components. This allows the calculation to be performed in stages, first integrating over the growth direction (kz) and then over the in-plane components, reducing the computational burden of simultaneous three-dimensional integration while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial integration by performing the kz integration analytically or with fewer discrete points rather than using full three-dimensional numerical integration. This partial action approach computes only the necessary components with sufficient precision while avoiding excessive computation in regions that contribute minimally to the final result

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Manufacturing precision

If extensive diagonalization of the Hamiltonian is performed to obtain accurate band structure, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of band structureVSAvoidcalculation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The band structure calculation is performed preliminarily at discrete k-points before the final integration. By pre-computing the Hamiltonian diagonalization at selected k-values and storing the results, the method avoids repeated diagonalization during the integration process, thereby improving calculation speed while maintaining band structure accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The calculation method dynamically adjusts the number and distribution of k-points based on the specific superlattice structure and desired accuracy. For regions of k-space where the band structure varies rapidly, more points are used, while in regions with slow variation, fewer points suffice, optimizing the balance between accuracy and computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9305122B1Computationally efficient method for building quantum heterostructures
Publication Date: 2016.04.05 THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
  • US9305122B1 patent drawing
  • US9305122B1 patent drawing
  • US9305122B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computationally efficient method for building a superlattice structure that improves an optoelectronic device performance characteristic that depends on fundamental superlattice material properties such as absorption coefficient α(ω), radiative efficiency Rsp and/or electron density n.