Superoxide Radical Advanced Oxidation Composition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for water and wastewater treatment are often capital- and energy-intensive, and face physical-chemical constraints such as hydrodynamics and mass-transfer limitations, with a void in the utilization of the O2⋅−/FAC process due to instability and difficulty in generating high concentrations of superoxide radicals for effective purification.

Innovation Solution

A novel advanced oxidation composition comprising a stabilized superoxide radical and free available chlorine, which can be produced at concentrations up to 3 mM, generating hydroxyl radicals and reactive chlorine species for efficient contaminant degradation, using methods like KO2 dissolution in alkaline media or UV irradiation of hydrogen peroxide.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional AOPs (UV/H2O2, O3/H2O2, etc.) are used for contaminant degradation, then effective oxidation is achieved, but capital cost and energy consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontaminant degradation effectivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical parameters by using O2⋅− instead of UV or O3 as the initiating species. This substitution eliminates the need for UV lamps and O3 generators, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining contaminant degradation effectiveness through the O2⋅−/FAC reaction that generates HO⋅ and RCS

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and eliminates the energy-intensive components (UV lamps, O3 generators) from the AOP system by using chemically-generated O2⋅− as the alternative initiating species, thereby achieving contaminant degradation without the associated capital and energy costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If UV-driven AOPs are implemented, then contaminant oxidation is achieved, but specialized infrastructure and equipment are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontaminant oxidation effectivenessVSAvoidinfrastructure requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the complex UV irradiation infrastructure (lamps, ballasts, shielding) by substituting it with a simple chemical generation system for O2⋅−, thereby achieving contaminant oxidation with minimal infrastructure requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses inexpensive chemical precursors (H2O2, KO2, or air + catalyst) to generate O2⋅− in situ, replacing expensive and complex UV equipment with simple, low-cost chemical reagents that can be easily handled and disposed of

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If O3-driven AOPs are used, then effective oxidation occurs, but extensive equipment for O2 handling and post-treatment O3 destruction is needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxidation effectivenessVSAvoidequipment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the complex O3 generation and handling equipment by using chemically-generated O2⋅− as the alternative initiating species, thereby achieving effective oxidation without the need for O3 generators, O2 handling systems, or post-treatment O3 destruction equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If O2⋅− is used in circumneutral pH conditions, then the reaction with FAC can be performed, but O2⋅− decays rapidly and cannot be handled easily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidO2⋅− stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies preliminary action by generating O2⋅− immediately before use through chemical precursors (H2O2 + UV, KO2 dissolution, or air + catalyst), ensuring the radical is present at the moment of reaction with FAC while minimizing decay time and handling requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses intermediary substances (H2O2, KO2, or air + catalyst system) that serve as stable precursors to generate O2⋅− in situ, thereby bridging the gap between stable storage forms and the reactive O2⋅− species needed for the FAC reaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

5Productivity

If high concentrations of O2⋅− are generated for effective AOP application, then purification efficiency improves, but generation difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurification efficiencyVSAvoidO2⋅− generation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses intermediary substances (H2O2, KO2, or air + catalyst) that facilitate the generation of high concentrations of O2⋅− through well-established chemical reactions, thereby overcoming the difficulty of direct O2⋅− generation while achieving the high concentrations needed for effective purification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the generation parameters by using chemical precursors that can be readily converted to high concentrations of O2⋅− under mild conditions, thereby achieving high purification efficiency without the technical difficulties of direct O2⋅− generation and concentration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a convenient, cost-effective, and highly-efficient method for advanced oxidation, achieving high radical exposures and contaminant degradation with minimal infrastructure requirements, suitable for various water treatment applications including drinking water and industrial uses.

Implementation Method 1

The reaction between O2⋅− and FAC has also been proposed as a source of HO⋅

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFree radical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

HO⋅ reacting non-selectively, and having high second-order rate constants for reactions with most organic, and many inorganic, contaminants

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

UV irradiation of hydrogen peroxide (UV/H2O2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotodissociation: Photodissociation

Implementation Method 4

KO2 dissolution in alkaline media

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRedox reactions: Redox Reactions

Data Source

PatentUS20230331602A1Advanced oxidation using superoxide radical and free available chlorine
Publication Date: 2023.10.19 UNIV OF WASHINGTON
  • US20230331602A1 patent drawing
  • US20230331602A1 patent drawing
  • US20230331602A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure provide an advanced oxidation composition, use of the composition in methods for advanced oxidation of chemical compounds in a medium comprising one or more chemical compound contaminants, and an apparatus suitable for administering the advanced oxidation composition to a liquid medium. The advanced oxidation composition comprises superoxide radical and free available chlorine, which react to produce hydroxyl radical and reactive chlorine species that effect organic compound degradation in mediums comprising chemical compound contaminants.