Superplastic Forming and Diffusion Bonding With Multi-Gas Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current superplastic forming/diffusion bonding processes face challenges in achieving uniform gas pressure distribution and preventing gas entrapment between sheets, which can lead to reduced diffusion bond strength and mechanical properties, particularly in complex aerospace structures.

Innovation Solution

The process involves injecting different gases between the core and skin sheets to control pressure and utilize venting grooves in the sheets to manage gas flow, ensuring uniform bonding and minimizing gas entrapment, with specific gas pressures and injection points optimizing the bonding process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If gas is injected between skin sheet and core sheet to form cavity and urge skin sheet against mould, then superplastic forming is achieved, but gas entrapment between sheets occurs reducing diffusion bond strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform accuracyVSAvoiddiffusion bond strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The gas injection system is segmented into multiple independent injection points and channels. Different gases can be injected at different locations (between skin-core, between core-mould, at flange regions) to create controlled pressure zones that prevent gas entrapment while maintaining forming accuracy and bond strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A third gas is introduced as an intermediary medium between the skin sheet and the mould. This third gas acts as a mediator to control pressure distribution and prevent gas entrapment at the skin-core interface, thereby improving diffusion bond strength while maintaining forming quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If gas pressure is maintained on core sheet to form diffusion bond, then bonding strength improves, but gas pockets may form reducing bond quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediffusion bond strengthVSAvoidbond quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different gas pressures and compositions are applied to different regions of the structure. The gas injection system provides localized pressure control at skin-core interfaces, core-mould interfaces, and flange regions, ensuring uniform bonding quality throughout the structure without gas pocket formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The gas injection system incorporates pressure regulation and control mechanisms that monitor and adjust gas pressure in real-time during the bonding process. This feedback control ensures consistent diffusion bond quality by preventing gas pocket formation while maintaining optimal bonding pressure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If single gas injection system is used, then process complexity is reduced, but uniform pressure distribution and gas entrapment prevention become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess complexityVSAvoidpressure distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The gas injection system is divided into multiple independent injection circuits with separate control mechanisms. Each injection point can be independently regulated to achieve uniform pressure distribution across the entire structure, preventing gas entrapment while maintaining manageable process complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the strength and fatigue properties of the diffusion bonds by ensuring intimate contact between sheets and reducing the likelihood of gas pockets, leading to improved mechanical performance in aerospace components.

Implementation Method 1

injecting a third gas on the side of the skin sheet remote from the core sheet, between the skin sheet and the mould, to force the skin sheet against the core sheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

heating the pack to a temperature at which the sheets are capable of superplastic deformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuperplastic deformation: Superplasticity

Implementation Method 3

maintaining gas pressure on the said side of the core sheet remote from the skin sheet, thereby forming a diffusion bond between the skin sheet and the core sheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion bonding: Diffusion Welding

Data Source

PatentEP3672744B1Superplastic forming and diffusion bonding process
Publication Date: 2023.05.24 BAE SYSTEMS PLC
  • EP3672744B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3672744B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3672744B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A process and apparatus for forming a structure comprising: a) forming a pack (200) from a skin sheet (16, 18) and a core sheet (10, 12), b) placing the pack (200) in a mould (20) and heating the pack (200); c) injecting a first gas between the core and skin sheets to urge the skin sheet (16, 18) against the mould (20); d) injecting a second gas on the side of the core sheet (10, 12) remote from the skin sheet (16, 18) to urge the core sheet (10, 12) against the skin sheet (16, 18); e) maintaining gas pressure of the second gas thereby diffusion bonding the sheets; and f) injecting a third gas between the skin sheet (16, 18) and the mould (20), to force the skin sheet (16, 18) against the core sheet (10, 12).