Supersonic Shock Wave Compressor Vapor Cycle

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional power plants using the Rankine cycle suffer from significant efficiency losses due to heat rejection during vapor condensation, leading to increased auxiliary power consumption and complex equipment requirements, while supersonic shock wave compressors in aircraft engines face challenges in adapting for stationary applications without rotating impellers.

Innovation Solution

A novel power plant cycle employing a supersonic shock wave compressor with a velocity choking device to transition subsonic vapor to supersonic velocity, eliminating vapor condensation and utilizing pump heat of compression as a renewable energy source, thereby reducing auxiliary power consumption and simplifying equipment needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If vapor condensation is used in conventional Rankine cycle power plants, then pressure restoration is achieved, but heat rejection to environment occurs causing 50% efficiency loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat rejection lossVSAvoidcondenser system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the condensation step from the conventional Rankine cycle. By using a supersonic shock wave compressor to directly compress vapor without condensation, the condenser system and associated cooling towers are removed entirely, eliminating the 50% heat rejection loss to environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the thermal-mechanical condensation process with a supersonic shock wave compression process. The supersonic shock wave compressor uses shock waves to compress vapor directly, substituting the conventional mechanical condenser system and eliminating the need for heat rejection to environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Use of energy by moving object

If supersonic shock wave compressor is adapted for stationary application, then compression power savings are achieved, but velocity transition from subsonic to supersonic must be implemented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauxiliary power consumptionVSAvoidvelocity choking device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The velocity choking device is positioned upstream of the supersonic shock wave compressor to pre-condition the vapor flow. This preliminary action transitions the subsonic vapor flow to supersonic velocity before it enters the compressor, enabling the shock wave compression mechanism to function effectively in a stationary application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The velocity choking device acts as an intermediary component between the vapor source and the supersonic shock wave compressor. It mediates the velocity transition from subsonic to supersonic, enabling the compressor to operate without requiring a rotating impeller while achieving significant power savings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances power plant efficiency, reduces air pollution, and allows for independent location from water sources, while providing economical electricity production and increased compression power savings.

Implementation Method 1

a velocity choking device to transition subsonic vapor to supersonic velocity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChoke flow: De Laval Nozzle

Implementation Method 2

The velocity choking device may include a pressure reducing valve, orifice, or convergent-divergent nozzle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure reduction: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 3

the impinging air onto the inlet cowl and cone or wedge creates shock waves; thereby, additively compressing the air with each of the oblique shock waves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave compression: Shock Wave

Implementation Method 4

the impinging air onto the inlet cowl and cone or wedge creates shock waves; thereby, additively compressing the air with each of the oblique shock waves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOblique shock wave: Oblique Shock Wave

Implementation Method 5

the turbine may be an axial flow turbine, a radial flow turbine, a steam turbine, a gas turbine, an impulse turbine, a reaction turbine, or the like

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdiabatic expansion: Adiabatic Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS12129790B1Power plant cycle for a new renewable energy or other heat source facilitated by a supersonic shock wave compressor apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 PHELPS SR CALVIN E
  • US12129790B1 patent drawing
  • US12129790B1 patent drawing
  • US12129790B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A new power plant cycle that does not condense the vapor leaving the turbine facilitated by an innovative vapor compression apparatus to repressurize the vapor with heat input to the cycle from a new renewable energy or other heat source. The new cycle can be used in place of the conventional low efficiency Rankine cycle to provide economical production of electricity. Using the cycle with heat input from a fossil fuel would reduce air pollution from this source to a fraction of current emissions.