Supplemental Appliance Control for Peak Heating and Cooling Loads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing heating and cooling systems face inefficiencies due to over-design to meet peak demands, leading to energy wastage and high costs, and they struggle to maintain consistent temperatures, especially when single large systems are used, which can preclude the use of alternative energy sources like solar heating.

Innovation Solution

A control system that includes a primary appliance and supplemental appliances, where a controller monitors operation levels and times, activating additional appliances when needed to provide supplemental capacity, allowing for efficient use of resources and flexible deployment of appliances based on demand.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single large heating or cooling appliance is used to meet peak demand loads, then the system can handle maximum loads, but the system becomes more expensive and experiences inefficient start-up and shut-down times with temperature swings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to meet peak demand loadsVSAvoidenergy inefficiency during cycling operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides a single large heating or cooling appliance into multiple smaller supplemental appliances that can operate independently. Each supplemental appliance is controlled by its own thermostat and can be activated based on local temperature conditions, allowing the system to meet peak loads without requiring one large appliance to cycle on and off repeatedly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If the design limits of the heating or cooling system are reduced, then the system cost decreases, but the system cannot meet peak demand loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem costVSAvoidability to meet peak demand loads
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines multiple supplemental appliances with smaller individual capacities into a coordinated network that collectively provides sufficient capacity for peak loads. Each appliance is sized for economical manufacture, but when multiple units operate simultaneously under centralized control, they deliver the total heating or cooling power needed during peak demand periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Power

If a single large system is used for heating or cooling, then the system can provide sufficient capacity, but it precludes the use of alternative energy sources like solar water heating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating or cooling capacityVSAvoidability to use alternative energy sources
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal platform where multiple supplemental appliances can serve different energy sources. Each appliance can be configured to work with various energy inputs including solar water heating, grid electricity, or other alternative sources, allowing the system to adapt to and integrate diverse energy sources rather than being locked into a single large appliance design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7547863B2System and method for control of supplemental appliances
Publication Date: 2009.06.16 THE MARLEY COMPANY
  • US7547863B2 patent drawing
  • US7547863B2 patent drawing
  • US7547863B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for controlling one or more appliances includes a control system where one appliance is in a condition such as having operated at full capacity for a predetermined period of time, and activation signal is sent to a secondary appliance. Appliances may be linked together to control each other, so that when a second appliance is operating at full capacity a third appliance is activated and so on.