Supplemental Fuel Control With Baseline ECU Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aftermarket dual injection systems for engines struggle to accurately adjust fuel delivery due to lack of integration with the baseline ECU, leading to inefficiencies and poor engine operation under varying conditions, particularly at low load scenarios, and cannot compensate for changes in fuel properties without reprogramming.

Innovation Solution

The system reorders calculations to make the supplemental fraction a dependent variable, using real-time data from the baseline ECU to determine precise fuel delivery through supplemental injectors, adjusting dynamically based on current engine conditions rather than relying on pre-programmed tables.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If DI injectors are used to increase power output, then fuel delivery capacity is improved, but dynamic operating ability deteriorates at low load scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel delivery capacityVSAvoiddynamic operating ability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel injection system is segmented into two independent injection systems: direct injection (DI) injectors for high power delivery and port injection (PI) injectors for low load operation. Each injector type operates independently based on engine conditions, allowing the system to leverage the strengths of both injection methods without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between DI and PI injection modes based on real-time engine operating conditions. The ECU constantly monitors engine parameters and automatically adjusts which injection system is active, enabling seamless adaptation from high power to low load scenarios without manual intervention or performance loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If auxiliary controllers are added to manage PI injectors, then fuel delivery flexibility is improved, but system integration and control accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel delivery flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The auxiliary controller for PI injectors is merged with the baseline ECU into a single integrated control unit. This unified controller has direct access to all engine sensors and parameters, eliminating communication delays and ensuring both injection systems are coordinated by a single brain that understands the complete engine state, thereby maintaining high control accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated controller implements continuous feedback loops that monitor actual fuel delivery from both DI and PI injectors against target values. Real-time corrections are applied based on feedback from oxygen sensors and engine performance parameters, ensuring accurate fuel metering adapts dynamically to changing conditions without requiring separate control loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If pre-programmed fuel delivery tables are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to changing conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidcompensation for changing conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel delivery system transitions from static pre-programmed tables to dynamic real-time calculations. The integrated ECU continuously computes optimal fuel delivery based on current sensor readings, engine load, and operating conditions, allowing the system to adapt instantly to changing conditions while maintaining computational efficiency through optimized algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes its control parameters dynamically based on operating conditions. Instead of relying on fixed lookup tables, the controller adjusts injection timing, duration, and split between DI and PI injectors in real-time based on measured parameters such as manifold pressure, temperature, and oxygen feedback, enabling continuous optimization without requiring complex user calibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12442345B1Supplemental fuel control system
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 STECK DAVID WILLIAM JR MR
  • US12442345B1 patent drawing
  • US12442345B1 patent drawing
  • US12442345B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An auxiliary controller operates in combination with a baseline ECU in a primary fuel (PF) system to determine a fueling level for supplemental fuel (SF) injectors. The auxiliary controller receives PF injector on time from the baseline ECU and determines a PF fuel mass and a PF fueled air mass for the primary fuel system. The auxiliary controller calculates a SF fueled air mass from a total engine air mass and the PF fueled air mass and then calculates a SF fuel mass and a SF injector on time. The auxiliary controller sequentially repeats the process for all of the cylinders in the engine and communicates the SF injector on times to the SF injectors for the cylinders.