Supply Chain Demand Distribution via Incentive-Based Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The unpredictability of consumer demand and delays in communication throughout the supply chain lead to increased costs and complexities in managing inventory and forecasting, resulting in higher costs and inefficiencies for entities in the supply chain.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that allows consumers to opt for receiving products at a future date in exchange for an incentive, which is based on the order lead time, enabling the communication of lead time orders upstream in the supply chain, thereby reducing inventory requirements and improving demand forecasting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If products are shipped immediately to meet consumer demand, then consumer satisfaction is improved, but inventory costs and supply chain complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsumer satisfactionVSAvoidsupply chain complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by offering consumers the option to schedule future deliveries in advance. This allows the supply chain to plan and execute shipments more efficiently, reducing last-minute rush orders and improving overall chain coordination without compromising consumer satisfaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces dynamic scheduling capabilities that allow consumers to select from multiple delivery time options. This dynamic approach enables the supply chain to adapt to varying demand patterns and optimize inventory allocation across different time periods, reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If safety stock is increased to handle demand variability, then service level is improved, but inventory costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice levelVSAvoidinventory quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By allowing consumers to pre-select delivery dates, the system converts uncertain future demand into known, scheduled demand. This preliminary action enables more accurate inventory planning and reduces the need for excessive safety stock while maintaining high service levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system collects feedback from consumers regarding their preferred delivery timelines and uses this information to optimize inventory allocation. This feedback mechanism enables dynamic adjustment of safety stock levels based on actual consumer behavior patterns rather than relying on static forecasts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If lead time is extended to allow upstream fulfillment, then transportation costs are reduced, but delivery speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransportation costVSAvoiddelivery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts lead times based on consumer preferences and supply chain capabilities. By allowing consumers to select from multiple delivery time options, the system can match longer lead times with less urgent orders (reducing transportation costs) while still meeting time-sensitive demands, thus optimizing the trade-off between cost and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the time parameter by offering flexible delivery windows instead of fixed immediate delivery. This parameter change allows the supply chain to optimize transportation routing and consolidation based on aggregated delivery schedules, reducing per-unit transportation costs while providing consumers with acceptable delivery timeframes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If demand forecasting is made more accurate, then inventory optimization is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemand forecasting accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops that capture actual consumer delivery preferences and compare them with forecasted demand. This feedback mechanism continuously refines forecasting accuracy by learning from real consumer behavior patterns, improving prediction precision without requiring overly complex processing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

By enabling consumers to self-select delivery dates, the system automatically generates accurate demand signals without requiring complex forecasting algorithms. The consumer choices themselves provide the data needed for precise demand planning, reducing the need for sophisticated data processing while improving forecast accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8380568B2Distributing consumer demand upstream in a supply chain
Publication Date: 2013.02.19 JDA TECH US
  • US8380568B2 patent drawing
  • US8380568B2 patent drawing
  • US8380568B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a computer-implemented method for distributing consumer demand upstream in a supply chain includes receiving, at a current time, an indication of consumer demand for a product that a consumer may be willing to receive at a future date rather than the current date in exchange for an incentive. The method also includes determining a particular incentive based on an order lead time for the product and conveying the particular incentive to allow the consumer to choose whether to receive the product at the particular future date rather than the current date in exchange for the particular incentive. If the consumer chooses to receive the product at the particular future date rather than the current date in exchange for the particular incentive, an order for the product is communicated to the upstream supply chain entity to allow the consumer to receive the product at the particular future date from current inventory of the upstream supply chain entity rather than from current inventory of the downstream supply chain entity in exchange for the particular incentive.