Supply Chain Risk Prediction and Supplier Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current supply chain management systems lack effective predictive analytics for identifying supplier disruptions and matching buyers with suitable alternative suppliers, leading to potential delays and increased costs due to unforeseen supply chain disruptions.

Innovation Solution

A supply chain management system that utilizes predictive analytics to monitor supplier operations, detect potential disruptions, and flag high-risk suppliers, while also providing a database of recommended alternative suppliers capable of meeting the same product criteria, thereby minimizing disruption impacts and optimizing supply chain efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a manufacturer relies on products from suppliers with regimented schedules, then production planning is stable and predictable, but when a supplier fails to deliver, the manufacturer's product is stalled causing time and money loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupplier delivery reliabilityVSAvoidproduction stall time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring supplier operations and predicting potential disruptions before they occur. Risk values are calculated in advance based on operational data, and alternative suppliers are identified and ready before actual disruptions happen, enabling proactive rather than reactive responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The supply chain management system acts as an intermediary between manufacturers and suppliers. It collects operational data from suppliers, analyzes risk factors, and provides manufacturers with risk assessments and alternative supplier recommendations, mediating the information flow to prevent production stalls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If the system monitors and analyzes supplier operational data to predict disruptions, then disruption risk is identified early, but data collection and analysis resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisruption detection timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Suppliers voluntarily provide their operational data to the system, eliminating the need for complex data collection infrastructure. The system processes this self-provided data using automated algorithms to calculate risk values, reducing both data collection complexity and processing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms complex operational data into a simplified risk value parameter that directly indicates disruption probability. This parameter transformation simplifies the analysis complexity while maintaining early disruption detection capability, as manufacturers only need to monitor the risk value rather than analyze raw operational data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9971981B2Supply chain management system
Publication Date: 2018.05.15 INDSTAR
  • US9971981B2 patent drawing
  • US9971981B2 patent drawing
  • US9971981B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An illustrative method for managing a supply chain is performed by a supply chain management server. The method comprises receiving information related to operations of a first supplier. The first supplier is responsible for providing a first product that satisfies criteria of a buyer. The method further includes determining a risk value that indicates a risk level of disruption of the operations of the first supplier and flagging the first supplier within a database of potential suppliers in response to determining that the determined risk value is greater than a risk tolerance threshold. The method also comprises notifying the buyer that the first supplier has been flagged and providing a list of recommended suppliers to the buyer. The recommended suppliers are each capable of providing a respective second product to the buyer. Each of the respective second products satisfies the criteria of the buyer.