Dynamic Support Request Prioritization via Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large organizations face challenges in efficiently prioritizing incoming support requests due to varying factors such as severity, importance, and contractual obligations, which existing static rules-based systems struggle to adapt to over time.

Innovation Solution

An automated system using a machine learning model that assigns a priority score to support requests based on current and additional information, incorporating hybrid parameter values and sentiment analysis, allowing for dynamic prioritization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If static rules-based systems are used to prioritize support requests, then the system is simple to implement, but it cannot adapt to time-varying factors and sensitive information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to time-varying factorsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic prioritization system that uses machine learning models to continuously adapt priority scores based on current support request information and additional contextual information. The system updates priority rankings in real-time as new information becomes available, rather than using static rules, thereby achieving adaptability to time-varying factors while managing complexity through automated computational processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a machine learning model as an intermediary between raw support request data and priority determination. This intermediary processes both current support request information and additional information (such as sensitive data not available to support personnel) to generate optimized priority scores, effectively mediating the complexity of multiple information sources while providing clear prioritization outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple factors including sensitive information are considered for prioritization, then prioritization accuracy improves, but information accessibility to support personnel is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprioritization accuracyVSAvoidinformation availability to support personnel
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments information into two distinct categories: current support request information that is accessible to support personnel, and additional information that may contain sensitive data not available to support personnel. The machine learning model processes both segments independently and integrates them to generate priority scores, ensuring that prioritization accuracy is improved through comprehensive data usage while maintaining appropriate information access boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model serves as an intermediary that can access and process sensitive additional information without requiring support personnel to have direct access to this data. The model translates this inaccessible information into priority score adjustments, thereby improving prioritization accuracy while preserving information security and appropriate access controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If manual prioritization by support personnel is used, then flexibility in decision-making is maintained, but processing time and human resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveticket processing efficiencyVSAvoidtime for priority assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service prioritization system where the machine learning model automatically generates priority scores without requiring manual intervention from support personnel. The system autonomously processes current support request information and additional information, computes priority rankings, and updates ticket queues automatically, thereby dramatically improving processing efficiency and eliminating time loss associated with manual priority assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of manual priority assessment by support personnel with an automated computational system based on machine learning. This substitution eliminates human time requirements for priority evaluation while maintaining or improving accuracy through systematic processing of multiple information factors, thereby significantly increasing overall ticket processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11574016B2System and method for prioritization of support requests
Publication Date: 2023.02.07 DELL PROD LP
  • US11574016B2 patent drawing
  • US11574016B2 patent drawing
  • US11574016B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, information handling systems and computer readable media are disclosed for determining a priority score for a pending support request document. According to one embodiment, a method includes receiving current support request information from within a pending support request document and accessing current additional information associated with the pending support request document. The method further includes associating a set of parameter values with the pending support request document, wherein the values within the set of parameter values are based on information within one or both of the current support request information or the current additional information. The method continues with determining a priority score corresponding to the set of parameter values, where determining the priority score comprises applying a machine learning model developed using previous support request information and previous additional information associated with previously-resolved support request documents, and assigning the priority score to the pending support request document.