3D Printed Support Structures With Interface Agent

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In 3D printing, especially in powder-bed techniques, support structures added to metal objects during the sintering phase often cause deformation and require manual removal, which is cumbersome due to their uniform composition with the object, leading to additional processing steps and potential damage.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that use a software application to analyze the object model and calculate the position, geometry, and number of support structures, incorporating an interface agent to create a weak interface between the support structures and the object, allowing for predetermined force removal after sintering, facilitating easier and automated detachment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If support structures are made from the same build material as the object, then they provide adequate structural support during sintering, but they become difficult to remove and require additional manual processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural support strengthVSAvoidsupport structure removal
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The interface between the support structure and object is given a different material composition (interface agent with different melting point) than the rest of the support structure and object, creating a localized weak point that facilitates selective removal while maintaining overall structural integrity during sintering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The interface agent has different thermal properties (melting point) compared to the build material, allowing the interface to soften and become removable at temperatures below the sintering temperature, enabling easy separation after the sintering process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of substance

If manual removal of support structures is used, then complete removal can be achieved, but it is cumbersome and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport structure removal completenessVSAvoidmanual processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The interface agent automatically softens at a predetermined temperature during or after sintering, enabling the support structures to be removed without requiring manual intervention, thus eliminating time-consuming manual processing while ensuring complete removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If support structures are added to prevent deformation during sintering, then manufacturing precision is improved, but additional processing steps are required for removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject deformation preventionVSAvoidprocessing steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interface region is differentiated from the rest of the support structure through the use of interface agent, creating a localized weak interface that allows automatic removal without manual intervention, thus eliminating additional processing steps while maintaining manufacturing precision during sintering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables cleaner and more efficient removal of support structures with a predetermined force, reducing manual processing and potential damage to the object, especially beneficial for larger volumes and automated production.

Implementation Method 1

a first portion of the layer is bound by the binder agent and a second portion of the layer is not bound by the binder agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferential binding strength: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

the green part is heated to cause the metal build material to sinter and fuse together

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS11491714B2Support structures and interfaces
Publication Date: 2022.11.08 PERIDOT PRINT LLC
  • US11491714B2 patent drawing
  • US11491714B2 patent drawing
  • US11491714B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one example there is provided a non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: obtain an object model; analyse the object model; obtain characteristics of an interface agent; generate a modified object model comprising a support structure and an interface between the support structure and the object, the interface being such that after generation of a 3D printed green part and after sintering thereof, the support structure may be released with a predetermined force; and controlling a 3D printer to generate a 3D printed green part based on the modified object model.