Supported Constrained Geometry Catalyst Polymerization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas phase polyolefin production reactors face disruptions due to the formation of solid polymer masses on reactor walls, known as sheeting or chunking, which interfere with fluidization and product discharge, leading to reactor shut-downs and decreased catalyst efficiencies when using metallocene catalysts.

Innovation Solution

A polymerization process utilizing a metallocene-based catalyst system comprising a supported constrained geometry catalyst, at least one monomer, and an additive such as aluminum distearate or ethoxylated amine in a gas-phase reactor system to prevent sheeting and ensure continuous operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If metallocene catalysts are used in gas phase reactors, then catalyst productivity is improved, but sheeting and chunking occur leading to reactor discontinuity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst productivityVSAvoidreactor continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces static control agents as intermediary substances that mediate between the metallocene catalyst system and the reactor walls. These agents (such as polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, or their esters) are added in small amounts (0.1-100 ppm) to control static electricity buildup on the reactor walls, preventing polymer sheets from adhering while maintaining catalyst productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the electrical parameter (static charge) on the reactor walls by introducing static control agents. This parameter change prevents the adhesion of polymer sheets to the walls by modifying the electrostatic interactions between the polymer and reactor surface, thereby eliminating sheeting and chunking problems while maintaining continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If static control agents are added to control static charges, then sheeting is reduced, but catalyst efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesheetingVSAvoidcatalyst efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using very small amounts of static control agents (0.1-100 ppm) rather than large quantities. This minimal dosing is sufficient to control static charges and prevent sheeting while avoiding the negative effects of excessive additive concentrations that would inhibit catalyst activity and reduce polymerization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent precisely controls the concentration parameter of static control agents to optimize the balance between static control and catalyst efficiency. By maintaining agents within the 0.1-100 ppm range, the electrostatic properties are modified enough to prevent sheeting while keeping catalyst activity unaffected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If reactor walls accumulate static charge, then polymer sheets form on walls, but disrupting fluidization and product discharge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolymer massVSAvoidfluidization
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Static control agents act as intermediary substances between the polymer and reactor walls, preventing direct adhesion. These agents (polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, or their esters) reduce the electrostatic attraction between polymer sheets and walls, allowing polymer to accumulate in the fluidized bed without forming adherent sheets on reactor surfaces, thereby maintaining proper fluidization and discharge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves reliable and cost-effective continuous polyolefin production by reducing static electricity and minimizing sheeting, thereby maintaining reactor continuity and catalyst productivity.

Implementation Method 1

The process achieves reliable and cost-effective continuous polyolefin production by reducing static electricity and minimizing sheeting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStatic electricity reduction: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

contacting a metallocene-based catalyst system comprising a supported constrained geometry catalyst, at least one monomer, and an additive in a gas-phase reactor system under polymerization conditions for creating a polymer product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS8957167B2Polymerization process using a supported constrained geometry catalyst
Publication Date: 2015.02.17 UNIVATION TECH LLC
  • US8957167B2 patent drawing
  • US8957167B2 patent drawing
  • US8957167B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A polymerization process includes contacting the following in a gas-phase reactor system under polymerization conditions for making a polymer product: a metallocene-based catalyst system including a supported constrained geometry catalyst, at least one monomer, and an additive selected from a group consisting of an aluminum distearate, an ethoxylated amine, and a mixture thereof. The additive may be selected from a group consisting of an aluminum distearate, an ethoxylated amine, polyethylenimines, and other additives suitable for use in the production of polymers for food contact applications and end products, including a mixture of a polysulfone copolymer, a polymeric polyamine, and oil-soluble sulfonic acid, in a carrier fluid, and mixtures thereof.