Supramolecular Therapeutics Design via Computational Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current approaches to cancer treatment, such as immunotherapy and nanomedicines, face challenges in achieving high therapeutic concentrations in tumors without causing systemic toxicity, and existing methods for designing supramolecular therapeutics lack insight into the mechanisms of self-assembly and interactions with excipients, limiting their effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

The Volvox process integrates computational modeling and human thought to design supramolecular therapeutics by combining quantum mechanical energy state- and force field-based models with all-atomistic explicit water molecular dynamic simulations to optimize molecular structures for stable interactions, enabling the creation of stable supramolecular structures like taxane and kinase inhibitors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If small molecule therapeutics or biologics are used to achieve high therapeutic concentrations in tumors, then therapeutic efficacy is improved, but systemic toxicity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacyVSAvoidsystemic toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The therapeutic system is segmented into distinct components: hydrophobic therapeutic agents are segmented from hydrophilic excipients through self-assembly into supramolecular structures. This segmentation allows the therapeutic payload to be concentrated in tumor tissues while the hydrophilic exterior minimizes systemic toxicity by improving circulation stability and reducing off-target effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Hydrophilic excipients act as intermediaries between the hydrophobic therapeutic agents and the aqueous biological environment. These excipients self-assemble to form supramolecular structures that encapsulate the therapeutic agents, enabling safe delivery through circulation and targeted accumulation in tumors via the EPR effect, thereby reducing systemic toxicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If nanomedicines or antibody-drug conjugates are used to deliver greater quantities of therapeutic payload to tumors, then therapeutic concentration is improved, but the ability to load enough payload onto the carrier becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic concentrationVSAvoidpayload loading capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The supramolecular structures utilize self-service through spontaneous self-assembly of molecular subunits driven by supramolecular interactions. This self-organizing process automatically optimizes payload loading capacity based on the inherent properties of the therapeutic agents and excipients, eliminating the need for complex external control mechanisms and achieving high payload capacity naturally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs parameter changes in the supramolecular interactions between molecular subunits to dynamically adjust and optimize payload loading capacity. By modulating factors such as excipient concentration, molecular structure, and interaction strength, the system achieves optimal payload encapsulation without requiring complex engineering controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If current approaches of engineering supramolecular therapeutics using stochastic design of molecular subunits are used, then supramolecular structures can be formed, but insight into mechanisms of self-assembly and interactions with excipients is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupramolecular structure formationVSAvoidmechanism insight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements feedback mechanisms through computational modeling and simulation that provide real-time insights into self-assembly mechanisms and excipient interactions. By integrating these computational tools with experimental data, the system continuously refines its understanding of supramolecular formation processes, transforming the previously stochastic design into a rational, mechanism-driven approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the rational design of supramolecular therapeutics that minimize exposure to normal tissues while effectively targeting tumors, potentially increasing therapeutic efficacy and reducing systemic toxicity.

Implementation Method 1

molecular subunits self-assemble through supramolecular 'weak' interactions to form large complex structures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-assembly: Self-Assembly

Implementation Method 2

all-atomistic explicit water molecular dynamic simulations of interactions with excipients

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMolecular dynamics simulation:

Data Source

PatentUS11554175B2Evaluation and optimization of supramolecular therapeutics
Publication Date: 2023.01.17 ALYSSUM THERAPEUTICS INC
  • US11554175B2 patent drawing
  • US11554175B2 patent drawing
  • US11554175B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure provides a process of designing and optimizing supramolecular therapeutics. The disclosure also provides a method for designing and optimizing antibody drug conjugates.